Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connolly Hughes James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connolly Hughes James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connolly Hughes James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connolly Hughes James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:52 | 07:52 to 06:00 | 50.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:44 | 07:22 to 05:38 | 47.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:14 to 03:09 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:42 to 44:42 | 0.0% |
| Connolly Hughes James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:24 | 04:35 -00:26 | 04:58 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:33 | 05:24 -00:31 | 09:33 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 14:26 | 03:11 +00:03 | 14:57 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 17:40 | 05:52 -00:25 | 18:08 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 23:07 | 05:31 -00:44 | 24:00 -00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 27:54 | 05:52 +00:04 | 29:31 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:52 | 33:50 | 06:14 +01:38 | 35:23 -01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 41:42 | 06:05 -00:21 | 41:37 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 47:26 | 05:02 -00:04 | 47:42 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 52:24 | 05:53 -00:14 | 52:44 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 58:03 | 02:25 -00:22 | 58:37 -00:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 01:00:06 | 05:53 -00:16 | 01:01:02 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:22 | 01:05:43 | 05:51 +01:31 | 01:06:55 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:13:05 | 06:47 -00:41 | 01:12:46 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:19:11 | 07:31 -01:04 | 01:19:33 -00:22 |
| Roxzone | 09:39 | 01:35:09 | 08:05 +01:34 | 01:35:09 |
James Connolly Hughes, your overall performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race was commendable. You placed well in your age group and demonstrated an impressive running profile, with a total running time 02:20 faster than the average. You adeptly managed your pace throughout the race, with no drastic changes in speed. Your strong performance in running, combined with your above-average performances in segments like Ski Erg, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry, indicates a hybrid profile of strength and endurance.
Consider implementing the following strategies in your next race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fourage Ervin | 2024 Paris | 01:35:31 | |
| Ewere Mudi | 2022 Birmingham | 01:35:21 | |
| NicolettiDowd Ryan | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:00 | |
| Luo Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:25 | |
| Kelly Adrian | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:13 | |
| Hermans Jos | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:23 | |
| White Jason | 2024 Dallas | 01:35:08 | |
| Lo Ocean | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:36 | |
| Quegan Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:19 | |
| Moorby Christopher | 2024 London | 01:35:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
