Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fourage Ervin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fourage Ervin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fourage Ervin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fourage Ervin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:54 | 08:17 to 05:23 | 42.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:33 | 07:11 to 05:38 | 22.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:42 to 03:09 | 8.0% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:23 to 04:59 | 5.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:23 | 06:23 to 06:00 | 5.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:57 to 04:35 | 5.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 07:34 to 07:12 | 5.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:39 to 02:20 | 4.6% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:37 to 42:37 | 0.0% |
| Fourage Ervin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 04:15 | 04:36 +00:21 | 04:58 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:12 | 05:23 -00:16 | 09:34 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:42 | 14:19 | 03:13 +00:29 | 14:57 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 18:01 | 05:51 -00:17 | 18:10 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 08:17 | 23:35 | 05:33 +02:44 | 24:01 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 31:52 | 05:52 -00:20 | 29:34 +02:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:23 | 37:24 | 06:17 +00:06 | 35:26 +01:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 43:47 | 06:06 -00:34 | 41:43 +02:04 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 49:19 | 05:03 +00:20 | 47:49 +01:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 54:42 | 05:55 -00:42 | 52:52 +01:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 59:55 | 02:26 +00:13 | 58:47 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 01:02:34 | 05:54 -00:24 | 01:01:13 +01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:11 | 01:08:04 | 05:52 +01:19 | 01:07:07 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:15:15 | 06:50 -00:53 | 01:12:59 +02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:21:12 | 07:35 -00:01 | 01:19:49 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:51 | 01:35:31 | 08:07 -01:16 | 01:35:31 |
Ervin Fourage displayed a commendable performance at the 2024 Paris HYROX event. He finished in the top 72% of all athletes and the top 75% of his age group (25-29), showing a strong competitive edge amongst his peers.
Ervin’s total running time was a notable highlight, coming in at 04:26 faster than the average race time. This indicates that his running capabilities are a distinct strength, providing him with a significant advantage during the race. His pacing throughout the race was well-calibrated, with most of his running segments being faster than average. This suggests that he has a solid understanding of his capabilities and knows how to manage his energy effectively across the race.
However, his performance in the strength-based exercise zones and roxzone indicates room for improvement. His slower-than-average times in these areas suggest that his transition times and overall fitness may need attention. The data suggests that Ervin has a runner profile, excelling in running segments but struggling with strength-based exercises.
Ervin should consider the following strategies to improve his overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacobs Peter | 2024 New York | 01:35:42 | |
| Ferger Michael | 2024 Berlin | 01:35:07 | |
| Pauli Thomas | 2021 Berlin | 01:35:53 | |
| Golger Chris | 2024 Paris | 01:35:13 | |
| Gillian Matthew | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:01 | |
| Renwick Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:47 | |
| Adler Eli | 2023 New York | 01:35:44 | |
| Slater Dan | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:15 | |
| Hicks Will | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:43 | |
| Bridgway Jacob | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
