Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 393 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Birnschein Ann's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Birnschein Ann's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Birnschein Ann's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Birnschein Ann's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:39 | 57:03 to 55:24 | 38.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 08:57 to 07:27 | 35.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:44 | 04:14 to 03:30 | 17.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 06:45 to 06:22 | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:10 to 06:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Birnschein Ann | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:30 | 00:00 | 05:57 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 06:30 | 05:29 -00:08 | 05:57 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 06:32 | 11:51 | 06:37 -00:05 | 11:26 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 04:14 | 18:23 | 03:26 +00:48 | 18:03 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 06:56 | 22:37 | 07:05 -00:09 | 21:29 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 08:57 | 29:33 | 07:36 +01:21 | 28:34 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 07:14 | 38:30 | 07:09 +00:05 | 36:10 +02:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 45:44 | 08:54 -02:44 | 43:19 +02:25 |
| Running 5 | 07:00 | 51:54 | 07:26 -00:26 | 52:13 -00:19 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 58:54 | 05:55 -00:33 | 59:39 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 07:08 | 01:04:16 | 07:20 -00:12 | 01:05:34 -01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 01:11:24 | 02:47 +00:01 | 01:12:54 -01:30 |
| Running 7 | 07:13 | 01:14:12 | 07:21 -00:08 | 01:15:41 -01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:45 | 01:21:25 | 06:35 +00:10 | 01:23:02 -01:37 |
| Running 8 | 08:34 | 01:28:10 | 08:18 +00:16 | 01:29:37 -01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:36:44 | 07:06 -01:31 | 01:37:55 -01:11 |
| Roxzone | 12:29 | 01:54:38 | 09:37 +02:52 | 01:54:38 |
When analyzing the splits, it is evident that Ann performed better in some segments compared to others. Her best running lap was 00:06:30, which was 00:51 slower than the average. She excelled in the Ski Erg segment with a time of 00:05:21, which was 00:04 faster than the average. However, there were areas where she lost time, such as the Roxzone, Running 1, Sled Pull, and Sled Push segments.
In summary, Ann Birnschein performed well in the Hyrox race in Essen, but there are areas that she can improve upon. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, reducing transition time, and implementing specific training strategies and techniques for the identified areas of improvement, she can enhance her performance in future races. Additionally, incorporating race strategies such as pacing, strategic resting, and mental preparation will further contribute to her success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rosa Carmen | 2023 Birmingham | 01:54:46 | |
| Herbert Pebz | 2023 London | 01:54:12 | |
| Peters Katie | 2023 Chicago | 01:54:26 | |
| Roberts Rachael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:54:10 | |
| Prince Koyel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:54:22 | |
| Civaner Melis | 2024 Marseille | 01:54:25 | |
| Stanley Emma | 2022 Manchester | 01:54:37 | |
| Kuhlmann Annika | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:54:30 | |
| Cowling Denyse | 2023 Chicago | 01:54:49 | |
| Long Jennifer | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:55:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
