Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 401 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stanley Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stanley Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stanley Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stanley Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:27 | 01:00:51 to 55:24 | 75.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:03 | 03:51 to 02:48 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 04:09 to 03:30 | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:38 to 05:35 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:09 to 07:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:02 to 08:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Stanley Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:20 | 00:00 | 05:58 +01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:38 | 07:20 | 05:29 +00:09 | 05:58 +01:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:01 | 12:58 | 06:38 -02:37 | 11:27 +01:31 |
| Sled Push | 04:09 | 16:59 | 03:26 +00:43 | 18:05 -01:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:45 | 21:08 | 07:05 -00:20 | 21:31 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 07:09 | 27:53 | 07:36 -00:27 | 28:36 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 06:53 | 35:02 | 07:09 -00:16 | 36:12 -01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:02 | 41:55 | 08:54 -00:52 | 43:21 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 07:20 | 49:57 | 07:26 -00:06 | 52:15 -02:18 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 57:17 | 05:56 -00:45 | 59:41 -02:24 |
| Running 6 | 07:53 | 01:02:28 | 07:20 +00:33 | 01:05:37 -03:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:51 | 01:10:21 | 02:47 +01:04 | 01:12:57 -02:36 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 01:14:12 | 07:21 +00:22 | 01:15:44 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:21:55 | 06:35 -01:24 | 01:23:05 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 08:00 | 01:27:06 | 08:18 -00:18 | 01:29:40 -02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 05:41 | 01:35:06 | 07:06 -01:25 | 01:37:58 -02:52 |
| Roxzone | 13:56 | 01:54:37 | 09:33 +04:23 | 01:54:37 |
Pacing and Profile:
Emma's total running time of 01:00:51 was 05:09 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she could improve her overall fitness and transition time in order to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:09:01 suggests that she has the potential to improve her running performance.
Overall, Emma Stanley has shown potential in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can improve her performance. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, running speed and endurance, strength and power, and transition time, Emma can enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Munteanu Louise | 2023 Paris | 01:54:24 | |
| Mccudden Lucy | 2024 Brisbane | 01:55:04 | |
| Angue Beyeme Jacky Fleur | 2023 Dubai | 01:54:45 | |
| Walker Amy | 2021 Dallas | 01:54:41 | |
| Jackson Tyla | 2024 Manchester | 01:54:45 | |
| Bodi Aniko | 2022 London | 01:54:38 | |
| Vachon Kim | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:54:34 | |
| Jordan Genevieve | 2024 New York | 01:54:46 | |
| Coles Michelle | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:56 | |
| Beavers Marissa | 2023 Dallas | 01:54:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:17:49 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:54:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
