Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quegan Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quegan Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quegan Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quegan Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:50 | 07:50 to 06:00 | 36.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:57 | 06:35 to 05:38 | 18.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:55 | 04:04 to 03:09 | 18.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 06:00 to 05:23 | 12.3% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:27 to 04:59 | 9.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:47 to 04:35 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:23 to 02:20 | 1.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:28 to 06:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:50 to 40:50 | 0.0% |
| Quegan Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:46 | 04:35 +00:12 | 04:58 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:24 | 09:33 | 05:24 -01:00 | 09:33 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 04:04 | 13:57 | 03:12 +00:52 | 14:57 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 18:01 | 05:51 -00:36 | 18:09 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:00 | 23:16 | 05:33 +00:27 | 24:00 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 29:16 | 05:52 -00:55 | 29:33 -00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:50 | 34:13 | 06:15 +01:35 | 35:25 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 42:03 | 06:06 -00:38 | 41:40 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 47:31 | 05:02 +00:25 | 47:46 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 52:58 | 05:54 -00:43 | 52:48 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 58:09 | 02:25 -00:02 | 58:42 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 01:00:32 | 05:53 -00:59 | 01:01:07 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:35 | 01:05:26 | 05:51 +00:44 | 01:07:00 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:12:01 | 06:50 -00:53 | 01:12:51 -00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:17:58 | 07:32 -01:04 | 01:19:41 -01:43 |
| Roxzone | 11:00 | 01:35:19 | 08:06 +02:54 | 01:35:19 |
Matthew Quegan performed impressively in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, securing a position in the top 48% out of 4107 athletes and ranking in the top 53% in his age group (30-34). His overall time was 01:35:19, with a total running time of 00:40:50, which was 06:15 faster than the average.
Matthew demonstrated a strong runner profile, as his total running time was faster than the average. His performance in the individual running segments was also noteworthy, as he consistently finished faster than the average. This indicates excellent endurance and speed. However, his performance in the roxzone segment was slower than average, suggesting that he took more time for transitions and rest.
Matthew should consider implementing the following race strategies for improved performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutsua Marcel | 2021 Hamburg | 01:35:19 | |
| Bracun Daniel | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:35:04 | |
| Tesselaar Jarno | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:11 | |
| Bermingham Johnny | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:59 | |
| Fourage Ervin | 2024 Paris | 01:35:31 | |
| Fernandez Salazar Ruben | 2023 Madrid | 01:34:58 | |
| Fenwick Jonathan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:49 | |
| Belcastro Vittorio | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:34:49 | |
| Lowe Tom | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:59 | |
| Holyman William | 2024 Perth | 01:35:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
