Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paterson Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paterson Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paterson Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paterson Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:19 | 07:07 to 05:48 | 29.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:13 | 05:51 to 04:38 | 27.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:00 | 05:28 to 04:28 | 22.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 04:47 to 04:20 | 10.2% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 04:59 to 04:40 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:44 to 02:36 | 3.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:33 to 40:33 | 0.0% |
| Paterson Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 03:37 | 04:24 +00:23 | 04:30 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 08:24 | 04:52 +00:07 | 08:54 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 13:23 | 02:51 -00:07 | 13:46 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 16:07 | 05:16 -00:11 | 16:37 -00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:28 | 21:12 | 04:47 +00:41 | 21:53 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 26:40 | 05:15 -00:06 | 26:40 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 31:49 | 05:04 -00:49 | 31:55 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 36:04 | 05:24 -00:12 | 36:59 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 41:16 | 04:45 +00:14 | 42:23 -01:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 46:15 | 05:16 +00:04 | 47:08 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 51:35 | 02:08 -00:22 | 52:24 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 53:21 | 05:15 +00:09 | 54:32 -01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 58:45 | 04:55 +00:56 | 59:47 -01:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:49 | 01:04:36 | 05:48 +00:01 | 01:04:42 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:10:25 | 06:17 +00:50 | 01:10:30 -00:05 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:23:19 | 06:32 -00:37 | 01:23:19 |
Ian Paterson, competing in the 60-64 age group, demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race. Ian ranked in the top 57% of 1203 athletes and secured the 5th position in his age group, placing him in the top 38% of his peers.
His overall time was 01:23:19, with a total running time of 00:40:33, which was 01:19 faster than the average. This indicates that Ian has a strong running profile, with his best running lap clocked at 00:04:59.
While analyzing the first four running segments, it can be observed that Ian started the race at a pace that was considerably faster than average, showing strong initial momentum. However, he needs to balance this energy exertion better to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race.
To improve his race performance, Ian should implement the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Neilson Eric | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:22 | |
| Woods Jordan | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:23:08 | |
| Otoole Sean | 2019 Miami | 01:23:08 | |
| Brett Reece | 2023 London | 01:23:25 | |
| Auguin Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:23:19 | |
| Street Josh | 2024 London | 01:23:03 | |
| Ormiston Michael | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:23:23 | |
| Weston Daniel | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:37 | |
| Chaves Paulo | 2023 Valencia | 01:22:56 | |
| Pimentinha Diogo | 2023 Malaga | 01:23:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:40:42 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:30:56 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:29:14 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:26:46 | |
| 2022 London | 01:43:59 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:48 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:34:16 | |
| 2023 London | 01:29:25 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
