Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 211 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Silva Aruna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Silva Aruna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Silva Aruna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Silva Aruna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:53 | 01:03:14 to 57:21 | 70.5% |
| Rowing | 00:47 | 06:23 to 05:36 | 9.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 08:30 to 07:57 | 6.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 09:08 to 08:38 | 6.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 07:49 to 07:28 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 05:20 to 05:03 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:16 to 03:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:46 to 08:46 | 0.0% |
| De Silva Aruna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 05:51 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 04:59 | 04:59 +00:21 | 05:51 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 08:15 | 10:19 | 07:01 +01:14 | 10:50 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 18:34 | 04:05 -00:49 | 17:51 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 10:58 | 21:50 | 07:41 +03:17 | 21:56 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 07:49 | 32:48 | 07:25 +00:24 | 29:37 +03:11 |
| Running 4 | 07:02 | 40:37 | 07:40 -00:38 | 37:02 +03:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:08 | 47:39 | 08:52 +00:16 | 44:42 +02:57 |
| Running 5 | 07:15 | 56:47 | 08:10 -00:55 | 53:34 +03:13 |
| Rowing | 06:23 | 01:04:02 | 05:41 +00:42 | 01:01:44 +02:18 |
| Running 6 | 07:07 | 01:10:25 | 07:57 -00:50 | 01:07:25 +03:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:17:32 | 02:58 -00:06 | 01:15:22 +02:10 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 01:20:24 | 08:02 -00:19 | 01:18:20 +02:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:30 | 01:28:07 | 08:26 +00:04 | 01:26:22 +01:45 |
| Running 8 | 09:57 | 01:36:37 | 10:23 -00:26 | 01:34:48 +01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 08:46 | 01:46:34 | 11:11 -02:25 | 01:45:11 +01:23 |
| Roxzone | 13:03 | 02:08:17 | 11:55 +01:08 | 02:08:17 |
Aruna De Silva delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 61% overall and 62% within his age group. His overall time of 02:08:17 showcases a balanced skill set, with particular strengths in the Wall Balls and Running segments, where he consistently performed above average. However, his total running time was slightly slower than the average by 28 seconds, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Notably, his initial pacing was fast, especially in Running 1, suggesting a strong start but potential energy management issues later in the race. Aruna demonstrates a hybrid profile, with a slightly better inclination towards strength, as indicated by his performance in segments like the Sled Push and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Higgins Lorcan | 2023 Dublin | 02:08:33 | |
| Hammar Martin | 2024 Stockholm | 02:07:49 | |
| Walbaye Adam | 2024 Madrid | 02:08:24 | |
| Britton Pete | 2023 Melbourne | 02:08:05 | |
| Lutman John | 2023 Dallas | 02:08:36 | |
| Teh Javier | 2024 Singapore | 02:08:29 | |
| Johnson Jonathan | 2023 Dallas | 02:08:38 | |
| Rios Adan | 2024 Houston | 02:08:39 | |
| Koh Tien Koon | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:07:50 | |
| Crawford Mickey | 2024 New York | 02:08:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
