Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
286 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 286 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 286 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Kumara Yash's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kumara Yash's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 286 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kumara Yash's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kumara Yash's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
02:44.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 286 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Yash Kumara, competing in the HYROX event in the age group 30-34, demonstrated a notable performance with an overall rank in the top 61% of all athletes. His total running time was remarkable, being 5:23 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his performance in strength-based exercises showed room for improvement. The race data suggests a pattern of starting slow, as evidenced by a slower Running 1, but a consistent improvement in subsequent running segments. This suggests an opportunity for better race pacing and strategic energy conservation.
Segments to Improve
Roxzone: Yash's Roxzone time was significantly slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance transition efficiency.
Training Strategy: Implement transition drills that mimic race conditions. Time yourself transitioning between different workout stations to improve speed and agility. Incorporate exercises like shuttle runs and quick-foot ladder drills to boost agility.
Sandbag Lunges: The time spent on this segment was slower compared to the 25th percentile.
Training Strategy: Focus on lower body strength and endurance. Incorporate weighted lunges, Bulgarian split squats, and plyometric exercises. Ensure proper form by maintaining an upright torso and engaging the core.
Sled Pull: Performance in the sled pull was below average.
Training Strategy: Increase upper body and core strength with exercises such as bent-over rows, deadlifts, and core stability workouts. Practice sled pulls with varying weights to simulate race conditions.
Farmers Carry: This segment showed significant potential for improvement.
Training Strategy: Focus on grip strength and core stability with exercises like farmer's walks using kettlebells or dumbbells. Incorporate core exercises such as planks and Russian twists.
Wall Balls: Although slightly faster than average, there is still room for improvement.
Training Strategy: Work on explosive power and endurance with high-rep wall ball workouts and dynamic medicine ball exercises. Ensure proper squat form and focus on a powerful upward thrust.
Ski Erg: Improvement in technique and endurance can aid performance.
Training Strategy: Focus on cardiovascular endurance and arm-leg coordination. Incorporate interval training on the ski erg and high-intensity rowing sessions. Pay attention to form, ensuring a powerful pull with full body involvement.
Burpees Broad Jump: While faster than average, enhancing explosive power can yield better results.
Training Strategy: Include plyometric exercises such as box jumps and burpee variations. Work on explosive power with short sprints and jump rope drills.
Race Strategies
Start with a Balanced Pace: Avoid starting too slowly by maintaining a consistent pace from the beginning. Incorporate pace-setting runs during training to simulate race conditions.
Optimize Transitions: Practice seamless transitions between exercises to minimize Roxzone time. Visualize the transition process and rehearse it during training.
Strategic Energy Conservation: Identify segments where energy can be conserved without sacrificing significant time. Focus on maintaining form and efficiency in strength-based exercises to avoid fatigue.
Focus on Strength Training: Given the strong running profile, allocate additional training time to strength and resistance exercises to balance overall performance.
Compromised Running Scenarios: Simulate running after high-intensity strength exercises to adapt the body to fatigued running conditions, ensuring better recovery between segments.