Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tonkin Louis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tonkin Louis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tonkin Louis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tonkin Louis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:22 | 07:10 to 04:48 | 38.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 05:03 to 03:49 | 20.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:46 | 02:56 to 02:10 | 12.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:44 | 04:29 to 03:45 | 12.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:25 to 04:07 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 04:44 to 04:26 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 01:55 to 01:41 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:07 to 03:55 | 3.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:07 to 34:07 | 0.0% |
| Tonkin Louis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 04:09 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:30 | 04:16 +00:09 | 04:09 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 03:56 | 08:55 | 04:27 -00:31 | 08:25 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 12:51 | 02:33 +00:23 | 12:52 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:16 | 15:47 | 04:48 -00:32 | 15:25 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:29 | 20:03 | 04:11 +00:18 | 20:13 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:10 | 24:32 | 04:46 -00:36 | 24:24 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 28:42 | 04:21 +00:42 | 29:10 -00:28 |
| Running 5 | 04:28 | 33:45 | 04:54 -00:26 | 33:31 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 38:13 | 04:33 +00:11 | 38:25 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 04:09 | 42:57 | 04:47 -00:38 | 42:58 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 47:06 | 01:54 +00:01 | 47:45 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:03 | 49:01 | 04:47 -00:44 | 49:39 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 53:04 | 04:20 -00:13 | 54:26 -01:22 |
| Running 8 | 04:37 | 57:11 | 05:09 -00:32 | 58:46 -01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 01:01:48 | 05:23 +01:47 | 01:03:55 -02:07 |
| Roxzone | 05:53 | 01:14:46 | 05:28 +00:25 | 01:14:46 |
Firstly, Louis Tonkin performed remarkably well in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 12% of all participants and the top 15% of athletes in his age group. His strong performance was particularly evident in his running, where he achieved a total running time of 00:34:07, which was 03:55 faster than the average time. This indicates that Louis is a runner profile athlete, possessing significant strength and speed in this area.
However, it was noticeable that Louis started slower than average in the first running segment, which might indicate a cautious approach to pacing. But, he quickly made up for this in subsequent running segments, consistently finishing faster than average. This could suggest that Louis may benefit from a more aggressive start in future races.
For future races, Louis might consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Allen David | 2024 Rimini | 01:15:10 | |
| Clement Stetson | 2024 Dallas | 01:14:27 | |
| Van Den Hoek Hans | 2024 Rimini | 01:14:48 | |
| Agirre Ibarra Xabier | 2024 Bilbao | 01:14:37 | |
| Jehan Alexander | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:14:19 | |
| Beckett William | 2023 Glasgow | 01:14:27 | |
| Sanchez Charli | 2024 Malaga | 01:14:37 | |
| Walton Dylan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:39 | |
| Carracedo Serra Borja | 2024 Madrid | 01:15:08 | |
| Davidson Connor | 2024 Singapore | 01:14:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Poznan | 01:13:58 | |
| 2024 London | 01:14:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
