Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 190 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fish Amy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fish Amy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fish Amy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fish Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:21 | 04:10 to 02:49 | 38.8% |
| Run Total | 00:59 | 36:28 to 35:29 | 28.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:54 | 04:29 to 03:35 | 25.8% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:50 to 04:41 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:41 to 01:36 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:29 to 04:28 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:20 to 01:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:25 to 03:25 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Fish Amy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:08 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:24 | 04:39 -00:10 | 04:08 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 08:53 | 04:18 +00:03 | 08:47 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 01:20 | 13:14 | 02:09 -00:49 | 13:05 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 14:34 | 04:31 +00:12 | 15:14 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 03:25 | 19:17 | 04:08 -00:43 | 19:45 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 22:42 | 04:31 +00:10 | 23:53 -01:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:29 | 27:23 | 03:58 +00:31 | 28:24 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 04:36 | 31:52 | 04:38 -00:02 | 32:22 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 36:28 | 04:49 +00:01 | 37:00 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:28 | 41:18 | 04:33 -00:05 | 41:49 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 45:46 | 01:47 -00:06 | 46:22 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:22 | 47:27 | 04:31 -00:09 | 48:09 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:03 | 51:49 | 03:22 -00:19 | 52:40 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 04:56 | 54:52 | 04:46 +00:10 | 56:02 -01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 04:10 | 59:48 | 03:21 +00:49 | 01:00:48 -01:00 |
| Roxzone | 04:43 | 01:08:34 | 04:25 +00:18 | 01:08:34 |
Amy Fish demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Poznan event, ranking 6th overall and 2nd in her age group, which places her in the top 1% of the 188 athletes in her category. Amy's overall time was 01:08:34, with a total running time of 00:36:28. This total running time was slightly slower than the average by 00:35, suggesting that Amy has a more strength-based profile. It is noteworthy that her best running lap was 00:04:21.
When analyzing her pacing, it appears that Amy started slightly slower than average in the initial running segments but improved her pacing in the latter segments. This could suggest she might benefit from a more aggressive start to leverage her strength in the later stages of the race.
There are a few key areas where Amy can focus to improve her performance. These are:
Amy should consider implementing a few strategies during her race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bangert Brittany | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:08:27 | |
| Fernandes Margarida | 2021 Madrid | 01:08:45 | |
| Bartiss Kristen | 2023 Dallas | 01:08:22 | |
| Nichols Brooklyn | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:08:04 | |
| Razvi Ayesha | 2024 Perth | 01:08:13 | |
| Jaffree Fanny | 2024 Marseille | 01:08:54 | |
| Byles Helena | 2024 Glasgow | 01:08:08 | |
| Kossack Pia | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:08:26 | |
| Vesely Georgie | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:08:59 | |
| Ruiz De Gauna De Miguel Irune | 2024 Bilbao | 01:08:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:10:53 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:10:53 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:19:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
