Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hanegraaf Tamara's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hanegraaf Tamara's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hanegraaf Tamara's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hanegraaf Tamara's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:54 | 08:00 to 06:06 | 67.5% |
| Run Total | 00:44 | 47:08 to 46:24 | 26.0% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:33 to 05:22 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Hanegraaf Tamara | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:13 | 00:00 | 05:16 +00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 06:13 | 05:10 -00:04 | 05:16 +00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 11:19 | 05:36 -00:18 | 10:26 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 16:37 | 02:50 -00:35 | 16:02 +00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 18:52 | 05:52 -00:20 | 18:52 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 24:24 | 05:58 -01:02 | 24:44 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 29:20 | 05:56 -00:11 | 30:42 -01:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:00 | 35:05 | 06:28 +01:32 | 36:38 -01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 43:05 | 06:06 -00:13 | 43:06 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 48:58 | 05:27 +00:06 | 49:12 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 54:31 | 05:59 -00:02 | 54:39 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:00:28 | 02:18 -00:10 | 01:00:38 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:03 | 01:02:36 | 05:56 +00:07 | 01:02:56 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 01:08:39 | 05:00 -00:19 | 01:08:52 -00:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:13:20 | 06:28 +00:03 | 01:13:52 -00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 04:24 | 01:19:51 | 05:11 -00:47 | 01:20:20 -00:29 |
| Roxzone | 08:42 | 01:32:50 | 07:19 +01:23 | 01:32:50 |
Tamara Hanegraaf showcased a strong performance in the HYROX event at Perth, finishing in the top 18% overall and top 20% within her age group. Her total running time was notably faster than average, suggesting a strong runner profile. However, the initial running segment was slower than average, which might indicate a conservative start. Despite this, she maintained an excellent pace in subsequent running segments, indicating strong endurance and speed. Her performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sled Pull was exceptional, making her a well-rounded athlete with a slight edge in running over strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oconnor Raquel | 2023 Chicago | 01:32:51 | |
| Zelionkiene Monika | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:33:07 | |
| Wong Wee Ming | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:32:33 | |
| Chiw Contreras Juanita Carolina | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:32:31 | |
| Pyburn Allie | 2024 New York | 01:33:17 | |
| Jones Ruby | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:44 | |
| Minaie Katayoun | 2019 Hamburg | 01:33:08 | |
| OGrady Alice | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:03 | |
| Platt Juls | 2024 Paris | 01:32:54 | |
| Verjee Mishal | 2024 London | 01:33:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
