Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mendy Pam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mendy Pam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mendy Pam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mendy Pam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:25 | 06:31 to 05:06 | 25.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:11 | 07:56 to 06:45 | 21.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 06:43 to 05:37 | 19.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 06:09 to 05:19 | 14.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:48 | 03:01 to 02:13 | 14.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:01 to 04:53 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 03:06 to 02:59 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:01 to 40:01 | 0.0% |
| Mendy Pam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:38 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:38 | 04:33 -00:06 | 04:47 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 08:05 | 05:15 -01:02 | 09:20 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 12:18 | 03:07 -00:01 | 14:35 -02:17 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 15:24 | 05:45 -00:53 | 17:42 -02:18 |
| Sled Pull | 06:31 | 20:16 | 05:20 +01:11 | 23:27 -03:11 |
| Running 4 | 04:40 | 26:47 | 05:43 -01:03 | 28:47 -02:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:43 | 31:27 | 05:56 +00:47 | 34:30 -03:03 |
| Running 5 | 04:56 | 38:10 | 05:54 -00:58 | 40:26 -02:16 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 43:06 | 04:57 +00:04 | 46:20 -03:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 48:07 | 05:44 -00:29 | 51:17 -03:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:01 | 53:22 | 02:20 +00:41 | 57:01 -03:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:07 | 56:23 | 05:43 -00:36 | 59:21 -02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:09 | 01:01:30 | 05:32 +00:37 | 01:05:04 -03:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:23 | 01:07:39 | 06:28 +00:55 | 01:10:36 -02:57 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:15:02 | 07:10 +00:46 | 01:17:04 -02:02 |
| Roxzone | 09:01 | 01:31:52 | 07:38 +01:23 | 01:31:52 |
Pam Mendy is a strong competitor in the 35-39 age group, finishing in the top 66% of his age group and the top 65% overall. His overall time of 01:31:52 shows his endurance and commitment. Particularly impressive is his running ability. His total running time of 00:40:01 is faster than average by 05:32, indicating a strong runner profile. He also started the race off strong, with his first four running segments all faster than average. However, his performance in the roxzone and certain strength-based segments suggests room for improvement.
Based on Pam’s performance, he should consider the following strategies in future races:
In conclusion, while Pam Mendy demonstrated impressive running abilities in the 2024 Paris Hyrox race, there is potential for improvement in strength-based segments and the roxzone. By incorporating the suggested exercises and strategies, Pam could see improved overall race performance in future events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Mark | 2023 Birmingham | 01:32:05 | |
| Johansson Erik | 2023 Stockholm | 01:31:43 | |
| Sandelmann Lars | 2019 Hannover | 01:32:07 | |
| Burke Stephen | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:32 | |
| Nieuwpoort Ruud | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:23 | |
| Richter Falko | 2023 München | 01:31:58 | |
| Grissell Edward | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:40 | |
| Sullivan Ben | 2022 London | 01:32:14 | |
| Ng Brendan | 2023 Melbourne | 01:31:38 | |
| Krüger Mario | 2024 Berlin | 01:32:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
