Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:03 (From 05:42 to 04:39) | 30.3% |
| Run Total | 00:39 (From 42:18 to 41:39) | 18.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:33 (From 04:56 to 04:23) | 15.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 (From 06:32 to 06:03) | 13.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:25 (From 05:15 to 04:50) | 12.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 (From 02:53 to 02:42) | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 02:11 to 02:03) | 3.8% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:58 to 04:58) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:44 to 04:44) | 0.0% |
| Dequier Pascal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 04:30 | 04:27 +00:29 | 04:36 -00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 09:26 | 04:57 +00:03 | 09:03 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 14:26 | 02:54 -00:01 | 14:00 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 17:19 | 05:23 +00:11 | 16:54 +00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 22:53 | 04:57 +00:45 | 22:17 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 28:35 | 05:21 -00:03 | 27:14 +01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:58 | 33:53 | 05:18 -00:20 | 32:35 +01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 38:51 | 05:32 -00:01 | 37:53 +00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 44:22 | 04:49 -00:05 | 43:25 +00:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 49:06 | 05:24 -00:07 | 48:14 +00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 54:23 | 02:11 +00:00 | 53:38 +00:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 56:34 | 05:22 -00:05 | 55:49 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 01:01:51 | 05:06 +00:09 | 01:01:11 +00:40 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:07:06 | 05:59 -00:06 | 01:06:17 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 06:32 | 01:12:59 | 06:30 +00:02 | 01:12:16 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:16 | 01:25:41 | 06:55 -00:39 | 01:25:41 |
Pascal Dequier, in the HYROX Paris 2024 race, delivered a commendable performance. Finishing at Rank 772, he was in the top 48% of all athletes, and within his age group, he ranked an impressive 7th, placing him in the top 21%.
His overall time for the race was 01:25:41, and he demonstrated a significant strength in running, completing the total running time in 00:42:18, which was 34 seconds faster than the average. His strongest running lap was at 00:05:00.
Looking at the initial segments from running 1 to running 4, Pascal started the race slightly faster than average, which may suggest a good level of initial endurance and speed. However, with regards to his race profile, Pascal shows a stronger affinity towards running, suggesting a need to focus more on strength training to improve his overall performance.
Considering the segments where Pascal lost time, a focus on improving strength and endurance for these specific exercises can significantly improve his overall performance. This could include incorporating more strength training exercises into his routine, particularly those that mimic the movements required in the Sled Pull, Ski Erg, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls segments.
Moreover, Pascal should also consider his pacing strategy. While he started the race faster than average, he may benefit from a more conservative start, preserving energy for the more strength-focused segments of the race.
Finally, practicing the transitions between segments - the Roxzone - can also improve overall race times. Even though Pascal was faster than average in this area, there is a potential for further improvement. This can be achieved by implementing specific drills that mimic race-day conditions in his training routine.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Payne Michael | 2023 New York | 01:25:20 | |
| Bourdon Quentin | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:44 | |
| Nilsson Robin | 2023 Malmö | 01:25:29 | |
| Hetherington Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:28 | |
| Grant Michael | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:54 | |
| Souness Neil | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:43 | |
| Budziarski Brett | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:45 | |
| Mordenti Mattia | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:24 | |
| Mcphee Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:28 | |
| Williams James | 2023 New York | 01:25:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Dequier Pascal
