Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 252 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Deconinck Marlène's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Deconinck Marlène's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Deconinck Marlène's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Deconinck Marlène's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:08 | 58:27 to 57:19 | 28.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 07:43 to 06:42 | 25.2% |
| Rowing | 00:50 | 06:52 to 06:02 | 20.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 08:09 to 07:35 | 14.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 08:16 to 07:50 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:43 to 05:40 | 1.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:24 to 08:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Deconinck Marlène | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:04 | 00:00 | 06:10 +01:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:43 | 08:04 | 05:36 +00:07 | 06:10 +01:54 |
| Running 2 | 06:46 | 13:47 | 06:45 +00:01 | 11:46 +02:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 20:33 | 03:30 +00:01 | 18:31 +02:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:45 | 24:04 | 07:21 -00:36 | 22:01 +02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 08:16 | 30:49 | 07:38 +00:38 | 29:22 +01:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:57 | 39:05 | 07:27 -00:30 | 37:00 +02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:24 | 46:02 | 09:30 -01:06 | 44:27 +01:35 |
| Running 5 | 07:07 | 54:26 | 07:44 -00:37 | 53:57 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 06:52 | 01:01:33 | 06:01 +00:51 | 01:01:41 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 07:00 | 01:08:25 | 07:27 -00:27 | 01:07:42 +00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 01:15:25 | 02:50 -00:13 | 01:15:09 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:18:02 | 07:33 -00:27 | 01:17:59 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:43 | 01:25:08 | 07:00 +00:43 | 01:25:32 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 08:46 | 01:32:51 | 08:59 -00:13 | 01:32:32 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 08:09 | 01:41:37 | 07:29 +00:40 | 01:41:31 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 09:57 | 01:59:34 | 10:34 -00:37 | 01:59:34 |
Marlène Deconinck showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris Hyrox event, finishing in the top 28% of 2328 athletes. Considering her age group (50-54), her overall rank is impressive. She finished the race in 01:59:34, an excellent time for her category. Her total running time of 00:58:27, faster than the average by 01:22, suggests a strong runner profile. Nevertheless, her pacing, especially in the initial stages of the race, needs improvement. Running 1 was slower than the average by 01:54, indicating a slower start than her competitors. However, she picked up the pace in the later stages.
In future races, Marlène should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford Harriet | 2022 London | 01:59:13 | |
| Rolo Emeline | 2024 Paris | 01:59:58 | |
| Ringwelski Sandra | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:59:39 | |
| Mwangi Leah | 2021 New York | 01:59:14 | |
| Gluth Laura | 2019 Hannover | 02:00:03 | |
| Ng Wen Yi | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:59:39 | |
| Sanderson Katie | 2023 London | 01:59:33 | |
| Benkhoucha Widad | 2024 Paris | 01:59:11 | |
| Zhang Helen | 2024 Manchester | 01:59:27 | |
| Besser Laura | 2019 Hannover | 01:59:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
