Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Wien using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 739 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pogac Sandra's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pogac Sandra's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pogac Sandra's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pogac Sandra's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:55 | 54:55 to 51:00 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:56 to 05:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:56 to 05:56 | 0.0% |
| Pogac Sandra | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:37 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 05:33 | 05:22 -00:02 | 05:37 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 06:31 | 10:53 | 06:08 +00:23 | 10:59 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 17:24 | 03:07 -01:00 | 17:07 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 07:25 | 19:31 | 06:31 +00:54 | 20:14 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 26:56 | 06:45 -01:28 | 26:45 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:50 | 32:13 | 06:34 +00:16 | 33:30 -01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:56 | 39:03 | 07:35 -01:39 | 40:04 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 08:01 | 44:59 | 06:45 +01:16 | 47:39 -02:40 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 53:00 | 05:42 -00:10 | 54:24 -01:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:56 | 58:32 | 06:37 +00:19 | 01:00:06 -01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 01:05:28 | 02:31 -00:08 | 01:06:43 -01:15 |
| Running 7 | 07:10 | 01:07:51 | 06:37 +00:33 | 01:09:14 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:15:01 | 05:42 -00:21 | 01:15:51 -00:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:20:22 | 07:16 -00:44 | 01:21:33 -01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:56 | 01:26:54 | 06:09 -00:13 | 01:28:49 -01:55 |
| Roxzone | 10:35 | 01:43:25 | 08:27 +02:08 | 01:43:25 |
However, there are certain areas where Sandra can focus on improvement. Her total running time of 00:54:55 is 04:26 slower than the average, indicating that she may need to work on her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her splits analysis reveals that she lost time in the Running 5, Running 3, Running 7, and Running 2 segments. These areas should be targeted for improvement.
In conclusion, Sandra Pogac performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific segments where she lost time and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Guasco Cecilia | 2024 Turin | 01:43:11 | |
| Garland Louise | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:48 | |
| Ix Tina | 2019 Essen | 01:43:46 | |
| Cacho Chelsea Patricia Pauline | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:43:14 | |
| Proudman Katy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:04 | |
| Renner Julia | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:43:16 | |
| Schmitt Verena | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:42:57 | |
| Girault Noémie | 2024 Paris | 01:43:55 | |
| Cairns Melissa | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:17 | |
| Leeman Claire | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
