Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Perrigo Josh's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Perrigo Josh's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Perrigo Josh's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Perrigo Josh's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:03 | 10:53 to 07:50 | 36.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:53 | 08:56 to 06:03 | 34.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 08:46 to 06:31 | 26.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 06:03 to 05:47 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:51 to 02:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:15 to 42:15 | 0.0% |
| Perrigo Josh | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 05:10 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:31 | 04:40 -00:21 | 05:10 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:50 | 05:37 -00:45 | 09:50 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 14:42 | 03:24 -00:33 | 15:27 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 17:33 | 06:07 -00:37 | 18:51 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 06:03 | 23:03 | 05:54 +00:09 | 24:58 -01:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 29:06 | 06:06 -00:43 | 30:52 -01:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:46 | 34:29 | 06:40 +02:06 | 36:58 -02:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 43:15 | 06:23 -01:05 | 43:38 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 48:33 | 05:09 -00:25 | 50:01 -01:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 53:17 | 06:14 -00:45 | 55:10 -01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 58:46 | 02:33 -00:04 | 01:01:24 -02:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 01:01:15 | 06:12 -01:08 | 01:03:57 -02:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:56 | 01:06:19 | 06:17 +02:39 | 01:10:09 -03:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:15:15 | 07:13 -02:02 | 01:16:26 -01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 10:53 | 01:20:26 | 08:13 +02:40 | 01:23:39 -03:13 |
| Roxzone | 09:25 | 01:40:36 | 08:44 +00:41 | 01:40:36 |
Josh Perrigo demonstrated a strong aptitude for running during the Hyrox race in Milan, with a total running time that was 7:12 faster than the average, indicating a distinct runner profile. His performance in running segments was consistently above average, with several segments placing him in the top 10 percentiles. However, his pacing strategy could have been more balanced, as his initial running segment was slower than average, suggesting a conservative start, but he quickly improved in subsequent segments. This indicates that he may have been able to push his pace earlier in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barten Mark | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:40:22 | |
| Facen Richard | 2023 Paris | 01:40:36 | |
| Wilde Max | 2023 London | 01:40:26 | |
| Andrianjakarimanga Marco | 2024 Marseille | 01:40:27 | |
| Leh Andreas | 2023 Wien | 01:40:55 | |
| Wardle Phillip | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:40 | |
| Marcou Sébastien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:40:07 | |
| French Chris | 2022 Birmingham | 01:40:39 | |
| Geekie Peter | 2023 London | 01:40:06 | |
| Moray Dominik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:41:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini | 01:55:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
