Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wardle Phillip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wardle Phillip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wardle Phillip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wardle Phillip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:32 | 10:03 to 06:31 | 62.5% |
| Wall Balls | 02:04 | 09:54 to 07:50 | 36.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:44 to 04:41 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:30 to 44:30 | 0.0% |
| Wardle Phillip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:45 | 00:00 | 05:08 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:45 | 04:40 +00:04 | 05:08 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 10:29 | 05:37 -00:16 | 09:48 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 15:50 | 03:25 -00:11 | 15:25 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 19:04 | 06:07 -00:46 | 18:50 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 24:25 | 05:53 -00:47 | 24:57 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 29:31 | 06:07 -00:29 | 30:50 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:03 | 35:09 | 06:41 +03:22 | 36:57 -01:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 45:12 | 06:24 -00:26 | 43:38 +01:34 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 51:10 | 05:09 -00:18 | 50:02 +01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 56:01 | 06:14 -00:51 | 55:11 +00:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:01:24 | 02:33 -00:27 | 01:01:25 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 01:03:30 | 06:12 -01:04 | 01:03:58 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:08:38 | 06:17 -00:41 | 01:10:10 -01:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:14:14 | 07:15 -01:15 | 01:16:27 -02:13 |
| Wall Balls | 09:54 | 01:20:14 | 08:13 +01:41 | 01:23:42 -03:28 |
| Roxzone | 10:41 | 01:40:40 | 08:45 +01:56 | 01:40:40 |
Phillip Wardle is a competitive athlete who finished in the top 54% of all competitors and top 58% of his age group in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. With an overall time of 01:40:40, he showcased an impressive performance, particularly in his running segments. His total running time of 00:44:30 was 04:46 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. This was evident in his performance in the later segments of the race, particularly Running 6 and Running 7, where he was significantly faster than the average times. However, his initial pacing could be improved as he started off slower than average in Running 1.
The areas that require the most improvement are the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, Wall Balls, and Sled Push segments. Phillip's performance in these segments was slower than the 25th percentile, indicating potential areas of focus for future training.
Phillip should consider the following strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bennaçar Ilian | 2023 Paris | 01:40:40 | |
| Beckmann Freddie | 2024 New York | 01:40:48 | |
| Horner Steven | 2024 Malaga | 01:40:20 | |
| Wegener Bernd | 2021 Hamburg | 01:40:32 | |
| Hogg Brook | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:46 | |
| Farrell Matthew | 2024 Stockholm | 01:41:07 | |
| Faure Baptiste | 2024 Marseille | 01:41:06 | |
| Gonzalez Damien | 2024 Paris | 01:40:10 | |
| Walker Brandon | 2024 Anaheim | 01:40:56 | |
| Garro Albano | 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
