Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Larter Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Larter Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Larter Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Larter Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 05:23 to 04:22 | 40.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:44 | 06:09 to 05:25 | 29.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:33 to 04:15 | 12.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:01 to 01:52 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 4.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 04:30 to 04:25 | 3.3% |
| Run Total | 00:04 | 39:08 to 39:04 | 2.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:14 to 04:12 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Larter Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:21 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:29 | 04:21 +00:12 | 04:21 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 10:02 | 04:42 -00:07 | 08:42 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 14:37 | 02:42 -00:39 | 13:24 +01:13 |
| Running 3 | 04:51 | 16:40 | 05:05 -00:14 | 16:06 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 21:31 | 04:32 -00:18 | 21:11 +00:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 25:45 | 05:04 -00:18 | 25:43 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:30 | 30:31 | 04:47 -00:17 | 30:47 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 35:01 | 05:13 -00:21 | 35:34 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 39:53 | 04:40 +00:02 | 40:47 -00:54 |
| Running 6 | 04:45 | 44:35 | 05:05 -00:20 | 45:27 -00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 49:20 | 02:02 -00:01 | 50:32 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 04:50 | 51:21 | 05:04 -00:14 | 52:34 -01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 56:11 | 04:40 +00:43 | 57:38 -01:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:03 | 01:01:34 | 05:32 -00:29 | 01:02:18 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:09 | 01:06:37 | 05:53 +00:16 | 01:07:50 -01:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:11 | 01:19:49 | 06:06 +01:05 | 01:19:49 |
Nathan Larter demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 160, placing him in the top 23% of competitors. Within his age group, he ranked 21st, indicating a competitive edge in the 40-44 category. Nathan's total running time was 1:17 faster than average, which highlights his proficiency in running. This suggests that Nathan has a runner's profile, excelling in cardio segments. However, his performance in the initial running segment was slower than average, pointing towards a possible pacing issue where Nathan might have started too cautiously. Improvements can be targeted in specific strength segments and transitions to balance his overall race execution.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Speece Steve | 2021 Dallas | 01:19:45 | |
| Hawk Noah | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:20:18 | |
| Maule Richard | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:40 | |
| Pilkington Andy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:16 | |
| Petruzzi Matteo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:36 | |
| Lenhart Patrick | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:32 | |
| Mason Oliver | 2022 London | 01:19:37 | |
| Mendoza Erwin | 2024 Anaheim | 01:20:17 | |
| Prior Bradley | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:03 | |
| Van De Geyn Thomas | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:19:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
