Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 886 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koep Nina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koep Nina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koep Nina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koep Nina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:10 | 05:32 to 03:22 | 48.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:00 | 05:23 to 04:23 | 22.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:58 to 04:19 | 14.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:24 to 02:02 | 8.1% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:05 to 04:55 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:50 to 04:41 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:06 to 38:06 | 0.0% |
| Koep Nina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 05:31 | 04:52 -00:02 | 04:36 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 10:21 | 04:52 -00:12 | 09:28 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 15:01 | 02:25 -00:01 | 14:20 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 17:25 | 05:08 -00:16 | 16:45 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:17 | 04:55 +00:03 | 21:53 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 27:15 | 05:08 -00:18 | 26:48 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 32:05 | 04:56 +00:27 | 31:56 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 37:28 | 05:14 -00:31 | 36:52 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 42:11 | 05:05 +00:00 | 42:06 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 47:16 | 05:11 -00:22 | 47:11 +00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 52:05 | 02:00 -00:12 | 52:22 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 53:53 | 05:08 -00:16 | 54:22 -00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:29 | 58:45 | 04:02 -00:33 | 59:30 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 03:53 | 01:02:14 | 05:26 -01:33 | 01:03:32 -01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:06:07 | 04:02 +01:30 | 01:08:58 -02:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:03 | 01:18:34 | 05:34 +01:29 | 01:18:34 |
Nina Koep delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 58 out of 2043 athletes, placing her in the top 2%. Within her age group (25-29), she ranked 13th, demonstrating her competitive edge. Her overall time of 1:18:34 and a total running time of 38:06, which is 2:59 faster than average, suggest a strong running profile. Nina's best running lap was 3:53, indicating exceptional speed. However, her initial running pace was slower, suggesting a conservative start. This strategy might have helped her conserve energy for later stages, where her running times significantly improved, placing her in the top percentile ranks for most running segments. The data highlights Nina's strong running capabilities, suggesting a hybrid profile with more proficiency in running than strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gunn Louise | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:45 | |
| Kruithof Franka | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:18:08 | |
| Heywood Laura | 2022 London | 01:18:44 | |
| Jones Holly | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:28 | |
| Khnle Anne | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:18:56 | |
| Little Louise | 2022 Manchester | 01:18:44 | |
| Depoli Camilla | 2023 Rimini | 01:18:07 | |
| Harrison Sally | 2024 London | 01:18:37 | |
| Campbell Lorna | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:38 | |
| Ogle Casey | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
