Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rimini using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 847 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Depoli Camilla's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Depoli Camilla's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Depoli Camilla's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Depoli Camilla's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:47 | 42:42 to 38:55 | 59.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:02 | 05:18 to 04:16 | 16.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 04:54 to 04:18 | 9.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 02:29 to 02:00 | 7.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 01:58 to 01:47 | 2.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 03:47 to 03:37 | 2.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:48 to 04:40 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:56 to 04:54 | 0.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:16 to 03:16 | 0.0% |
| Depoli Camilla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:37 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 04:48 | 04:51 -00:03 | 04:37 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:36 | 04:52 +00:02 | 09:28 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 14:30 | 02:24 +00:05 | 14:20 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 16:59 | 05:06 +00:21 | 16:44 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 22:26 | 04:50 +00:28 | 21:50 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 27:44 | 05:07 +00:24 | 26:40 +01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:54 | 33:15 | 04:52 +00:02 | 31:47 +01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 38:09 | 05:12 +00:19 | 36:39 +01:30 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 43:40 | 05:04 -00:08 | 41:51 +01:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 48:36 | 05:09 +00:14 | 46:55 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 53:59 | 02:00 -00:02 | 52:04 +01:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 55:57 | 05:07 +00:16 | 54:04 +01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:47 | 01:01:20 | 04:01 -00:14 | 59:11 +02:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:05:07 | 05:24 +00:24 | 01:03:12 +01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 03:16 | 01:10:55 | 03:59 -00:43 | 01:08:36 +02:19 |
| Roxzone | 04:03 | 01:18:07 | 05:32 -01:29 | 01:18:07 |
However, there are areas where Camilla can improve her performance. Her total running time of 00:42:42 was 03:12 slower than the average, indicating that she may need to work on her running speed and efficiency. Additionally, her performance in certain segments, such as Running 1, Running 3, and Running 5, showed slower times compared to the average, suggesting that she may have paced herself too conservatively during these sections.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Camilla can enhance her performance in future races and continue to excel as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccluskey Haylie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:20 | |
| Wood Billie | 2022 London | 01:17:53 | |
| Inmon Lauren | 2023 Houston | 01:18:35 | |
| Usher Sarah | 2023 Dubai | 01:18:34 | |
| Lesund Helene | 2022 Wien | 01:18:15 | |
| Dickson Laura | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:30 | |
| Wesselink Jeanine | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:18:05 | |
| Johnson Rachael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:56 | |
| Wachsmuth Ina | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:09 | |
| Mcintosh Alice | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
