Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 690 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dean Ann's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dean Ann's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dean Ann's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dean Ann's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 08:58 to 06:08 | 44.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:41 | 10:14 to 07:33 | 41.9% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 06:00 to 05:42 | 4.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 07:00 to 06:43 | 4.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:53 to 05:42 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:31 to 05:24 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:16 to 49:16 | 0.0% |
| Dean Ann | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 05:44 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:31 | 04:41 | 05:23 +00:08 | 05:44 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 10:12 | 06:13 -00:12 | 11:07 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 16:13 | 03:10 -00:37 | 17:20 -01:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 18:46 | 06:35 -00:23 | 20:30 -01:44 |
| Sled Pull | 07:00 | 24:58 | 06:46 +00:14 | 27:05 -02:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:22 | 31:58 | 06:38 -00:16 | 33:51 -01:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:14 | 38:20 | 07:49 +02:25 | 40:29 -02:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:25 | 48:34 | 06:52 -00:27 | 48:18 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 06:00 | 54:59 | 05:45 +00:15 | 55:10 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 01:00:59 | 06:45 -00:18 | 01:00:55 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:07:26 | 02:34 -00:15 | 01:07:40 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:18 | 01:09:45 | 06:42 -00:24 | 01:10:14 -00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:16:03 | 05:51 +00:02 | 01:16:56 -00:53 |
| Running 8 | 06:51 | 01:21:56 | 07:26 -00:35 | 01:22:47 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 08:58 | 01:28:47 | 06:19 +02:39 | 01:30:13 -01:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:37 | 01:45:17 | 08:45 -01:08 | 01:45:17 |
Ann's total running time of 00:49:16 was particularly impressive, as it was 02:35 faster than the average for her finish time. This suggests that Ann has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on her running training. Her best running lap time of 00:04:41 was particularly noteworthy, as it was 00:45 faster than the average for her finish time.
In conclusion, Ann Dean demonstrated a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, particularly in the running segments. To further enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her performance in the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Rowing segments. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and form corrections tailored to these areas, Ann can continue to excel in future races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental preparation will contribute to overall improvement in her performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kazen Annemarijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:46 | |
| Thompson Olivia | 2023 Manchester | 01:44:47 | |
| Jackson Stacey | 2023 Melbourne | 01:45:02 | |
| Stevens Emma | 2023 Stockholm | 01:45:12 | |
| Ripley Lisa | 2022 Manchester | 01:45:36 | |
| Spencer Emaya | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:31 | |
| Launay Daphné | 2024 Paris | 01:45:26 | |
| De Cesero Lucia | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:44:58 | |
| Kerkhof Marloes | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:06 | |
| Smith Lauren | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
