Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Abelman Jerome's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Abelman Jerome's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Abelman Jerome's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Abelman Jerome's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 09:06 to 06:51 | 44.9% |
| Run Total | 01:50 | 51:15 to 49:25 | 36.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 07:10 to 06:20 | 16.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 08:22 to 08:16 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Abelman Jerome | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 05:16 +01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 06:27 | 04:43 -00:19 | 05:16 +01:11 |
| Running 2 | 08:00 | 10:51 | 05:46 +02:14 | 09:59 +00:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 18:51 | 03:29 -00:15 | 15:45 +03:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 22:05 | 06:21 -00:34 | 19:14 +02:51 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 27:52 | 06:06 -00:46 | 25:35 +02:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 33:12 | 06:20 -00:12 | 31:41 +01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:06 | 39:20 | 07:01 +02:05 | 38:01 +01:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 48:26 | 06:36 -00:05 | 45:02 +03:24 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 54:57 | 05:13 -00:11 | 51:38 +03:19 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 59:59 | 06:24 -00:02 | 56:51 +03:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:06:21 | 02:36 -00:11 | 01:03:15 +03:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:08:46 | 06:26 -00:05 | 01:05:51 +02:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:10 | 01:15:07 | 06:33 +00:37 | 01:12:17 +02:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:22:17 | 07:33 -01:50 | 01:18:50 +03:27 |
| Wall Balls | 08:22 | 01:28:00 | 08:33 -00:11 | 01:26:23 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:44:10 | 09:14 -01:17 | 01:44:10 |
Jerome Abelman delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan HYROX race, ranking 6th in his age group and 1107th overall. His total running time was marginally slower than average, indicating a balanced profile leaning slightly towards strength. The standout segment was Running 8, where he completed the lap significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong finish and potential for improved pacing. His pacing strategy seems to have been conservative at the start, as reflected in Running 1 and Running 2, where his times were notably slower than average. This indicates a need for better pacing across the event. His Roxzone time was impressively faster than average, showcasing efficient transitions between exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bartley Matthew | 2023 Manchester | 01:43:46 | |
| JOLLY WALTER | 2022 Dallas | 01:44:07 | |
| Heitze Sebastian | 2024 Köln | 01:44:13 | |
| Beck William | 2023 London | 01:44:17 | |
| Gehl Lars | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:43:58 | |
| Siccardi Andrea | 2024 Turin | 01:43:52 | |
| Paola Alberto | 2024 Milan | 01:44:26 | |
| Taipale Angel | 2023 Chicago | 01:44:21 | |
| Kelly James | 2024 Dublin | 01:44:21 | |
| Mitchell Paul | 2023 Dublin | 01:44:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:46 | |
| 2024 New York | 01:33:58 | |
| 2022 London | 01:36:40 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:35:30 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:30 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:51 | |
| 2023 London | 01:33:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
