Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire VennBrown Mitch's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights VennBrown Mitch's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the VennBrown Mitch's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve VennBrown Mitch's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:35 | 45:46 to 43:11 | 61.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 06:08 to 05:22 | 18.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 05:45 to 05:07 | 15.0% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:59 to 04:49 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:13 to 02:09 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:56 to 05:56 | 0.0% |
| VennBrown Mitch | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:08 | 04:30 -00:15 | 04:45 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 08:23 | 05:06 -00:02 | 09:15 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:02 | 13:27 | 03:01 -00:59 | 14:21 -00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 15:29 | 05:34 +00:02 | 17:22 -01:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 21:05 | 05:10 -00:47 | 22:56 -01:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 25:28 | 05:33 +00:06 | 28:06 -02:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:08 | 31:07 | 05:41 +00:27 | 33:39 -02:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 37:15 | 05:44 -00:07 | 39:20 -02:05 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 42:52 | 04:53 +00:06 | 45:04 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:29 | 47:51 | 05:35 +00:54 | 49:57 -02:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 54:20 | 02:16 -00:03 | 55:32 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 56:33 | 05:34 +00:43 | 57:48 -01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 01:02:50 | 05:24 +00:21 | 01:03:22 -00:32 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:08:35 | 06:15 +00:45 | 01:08:46 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:56 | 01:15:35 | 06:52 -00:56 | 01:15:01 +00:34 |
| Roxzone | 07:44 | 01:29:08 | 07:15 +00:29 | 01:29:08 |
Mitch VennBrown's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race demonstrates strong capabilities in strength-based exercises, notably excelling in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he ranked impressively high. However, the total running time was slower than average, indicating that running may be an area for focused improvement. The initial running segments, particularly Running 1, were executed at a faster pace than average, suggesting a potentially unsustainable start that led to a decline in average running speed in later segments. This indicates a need for better pacing strategy. Overall, Mitch displays a hybrid profile but leans more towards strength, with room for improvement in endurance and running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Macgregor Colin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:30 | |
| Baart Kyal | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:55 | |
| Zandsteeg Meeuwis | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:41 | |
| Connolly Kevin | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:09 | |
| Dekker Noah | 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:51 | |
| Duale Mitch | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:29:07 | |
| Jumeaux Stephane | 2024 Paris | 01:29:28 | |
| Gilpin Chris | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:12 | |
| Brown Jamie | 2022 Manchester | 01:28:43 | |
| Paterson Ian | 2023 London | 01:29:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
