Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 424 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vanheems Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vanheems Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vanheems Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vanheems Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 03:40 | 10:58 to 07:18 | 75.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 06:59 to 06:13 | 15.8% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 06:19 to 05:53 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:47 to 06:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 53:15 to 53:15 | 0.0% |
| Vanheems Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:17 | 00:00 | 05:53 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:32 | 06:17 | 05:31 +00:01 | 05:53 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 11:49 | 06:35 -00:25 | 11:24 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 17:59 | 03:23 -00:55 | 17:59 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:28 | 20:27 | 06:58 -00:30 | 21:22 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 10:58 | 26:55 | 07:17 +03:41 | 28:20 -01:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:33 | 37:53 | 07:01 -00:28 | 35:37 +02:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:47 | 44:26 | 08:35 -01:48 | 42:38 +01:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 51:13 | 07:18 -00:29 | 51:13 +00:00 |
| Rowing | 06:19 | 58:02 | 05:51 +00:28 | 58:31 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 06:44 | 01:04:21 | 07:07 -00:23 | 01:04:22 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 01:11:05 | 02:43 +00:00 | 01:11:29 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:43 | 01:13:48 | 07:08 -00:25 | 01:14:12 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:59 | 01:20:31 | 06:23 +00:36 | 01:21:20 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 07:34 | 01:27:30 | 08:03 -00:29 | 01:27:43 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:35:04 | 06:57 -01:40 | 01:35:46 -00:42 |
| Roxzone | 11:53 | 01:52:07 | 09:24 +02:29 | 01:52:07 |
Emma Vanheems delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 577, placing her in the top 32% of all athletes and in the top 29% of her age group. Her overall time was 01:52:07. Emma showed a strong running profile, with a total running time of 00:53:15, which was 03:40 faster than the average, indicating her strength in running compared to strength-based exercises. However, the pacing analysis suggests that Emma started slightly slower, with her initial running segment being 00:33 slower than average, but she quickly gained momentum in subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson Ellis | 2022 Manchester | 01:51:48 | |
| Goldbach Magdalena | 2023 München | 01:51:39 | |
| Jacobs Jayne | 2023 Birmingham | 01:52:17 | |
| Schulte Marisa | 2022 Hamburg | 01:52:04 | |
| Parker Stephanie | 2023 Chicago | 01:52:31 | |
| Klink Petra | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:52:05 | |
| Stryjewska Agata | 2023 Birmingham | 01:51:50 | |
| Warner Emma | 2023 Hamburg | 01:52:17 | |
| Kates Erin | 2019 New York | 01:52:10 | |
| Burghardt Anika | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:52:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
