Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Reckemeier Kai's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Reckemeier Kai's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Reckemeier Kai's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Reckemeier Kai's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:54 | 07:57 to 06:03 | 40.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 06:10 to 05:00 | 24.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 05:41 to 04:50 | 18.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:44 to 04:23 | 7.4% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:59 to 04:44 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:48 to 02:42 | 2.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:43 to 04:38 | 1.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:50 to 39:50 | 0.0% |
| Reckemeier Kai | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:03 | 04:27 +00:17 | 04:36 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 09:47 | 04:57 -00:22 | 09:03 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 14:22 | 02:55 -00:07 | 14:00 +00:22 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 17:10 | 05:24 -00:35 | 16:55 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 21:59 | 04:57 -00:14 | 22:19 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 26:42 | 05:22 -00:25 | 27:16 -00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 31:39 | 05:19 +00:51 | 32:38 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 37:49 | 05:33 -00:39 | 37:57 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 42:43 | 04:49 +00:10 | 43:30 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 47:42 | 05:24 -00:25 | 48:19 -00:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 52:41 | 02:11 -00:21 | 53:43 -01:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:57 | 54:31 | 05:23 -00:26 | 55:54 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:41 | 59:28 | 05:06 +00:35 | 01:01:17 -01:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:05:09 | 05:59 -00:21 | 01:06:23 -01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:57 | 01:10:47 | 06:31 +01:26 | 01:12:22 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 07:07 | 01:25:45 | 06:52 +00:15 | 01:25:45 |
Kai Reckemeier demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Hamburg HYROX race. In the overall rank, he positioned himself in the top 59% out of 823 athletes, illustrating his competitive ability in his age group. Specifically noteworthy is his total running time, which was 03:05 faster than the average, indicating Kai's strength lies significantly in his running abilities. This strength was consistently seen across all his running segments, with his best running lap recorded at 00:04:35. However, it seems that Kai started the race a bit slower compared to the average pace in Running 1, but managed to pick up speed in the subsequent segments, indicating good race pacing.
Despite his strong running performance, there are areas where Kai can focus on for improvement. These include the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, Sandbag Lunges, Ski Erg, Sled Pull, and Rowing segments.
Given the above analysis, Kai should consider the following strategies for his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ansell Oliver | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:31 | |
| Lees Martin | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:25 | |
| Kearney Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:36 | |
| Andersson Jesper | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:26:01 | |
| Bonilla Gil Alejandro | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:09 | |
| Metoyer Michael | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:02 | |
| Martin Philip | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:32 | |
| Kraak Eelke | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:52 | |
| Dassigny Florian | 2024 Paris | 01:25:44 | |
| Ribeiro Miguel | 2021 Madrid | 01:26:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
