Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 750 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Osborne Kelly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Osborne Kelly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Osborne Kelly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Osborne Kelly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:48 | 05:23 to 03:35 | 32.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:46 | 05:58 to 04:12 | 31.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 05:47 to 04:14 | 27.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:06 to 01:46 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:00 to 04:53 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:01 to 01:59 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:45 to 37:45 | 0.0% |
| Osborne Kelly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 04:31 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:30 | 04:50 -00:16 | 04:31 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 09:04 | 04:47 -00:20 | 09:21 -00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 13:31 | 02:23 -00:22 | 14:08 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 15:32 | 05:00 -00:23 | 16:31 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 05:58 | 20:09 | 04:43 +01:15 | 21:31 -01:22 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 26:07 | 05:01 -00:11 | 26:14 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 30:57 | 04:47 +01:00 | 31:15 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:03 | 36:44 | 05:07 -00:04 | 36:02 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 41:47 | 05:03 -00:03 | 41:09 +00:38 |
| Running 6 | 04:44 | 46:47 | 05:03 -00:19 | 46:12 +00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 51:31 | 01:58 +00:08 | 51:15 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 04:39 | 53:37 | 05:03 -00:24 | 53:13 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 58:16 | 03:51 +01:32 | 58:16 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 04:59 | 01:03:39 | 05:20 -00:21 | 01:02:07 +01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 02:54 | 01:08:38 | 03:54 -01:00 | 01:07:27 +01:11 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:16:47 | 05:26 -00:01 | 01:16:47 |
Kelly Osborne delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, placing 68th overall among 1801 athletes, and securing the 5th position in her age group of 45-49. Her overall time was 01:16:47, with a total running time of 00:37:45, which is 02:38 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. The best running lap was clocked at 00:04:27. The initial running segments suggest that Kelly started at a slightly slower pace compared to the average but quickly found her rhythm, performing notably well in subsequent running segments. While her running prowess is evident, some strength-based exercises, particularly the Sandbag Lunges and Sled Pull, presented challenges. Her Roxzone time was slightly slower than average, indicating potential for improved transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Waal Nienke | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:03 | |
| Salvage Leah | 2024 Cape Town | 01:17:14 | |
| Stahl Larisa | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:17:01 | |
| Moore Holly | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:16:25 | |
| Nickels Dani | 2019 Leipzig | 01:16:28 | |
| Hilton Katy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:16:36 | |
| Blankemeier Tanja | 2023 Hamburg | 01:16:39 | |
| Boukal Barbara | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:17:16 | |
| Sims Clare | 2021 Birmingham | 01:16:51 | |
| Maguire Olive | 2024 Paris | 01:16:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
