Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 523 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Emmie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Emmie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Emmie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Emmie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:43 | 56:15 to 53:32 | 59.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:58 | 07:34 to 06:36 | 21.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 06:45 to 06:01 | 16.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:49 to 02:40 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:56 to 05:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:57 to 07:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Jones Emmie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 05:47 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 04:46 | 05:29 -00:19 | 05:47 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:52 | 09:56 | 06:24 +00:28 | 11:16 -01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 16:48 | 03:23 -00:22 | 17:40 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 07:55 | 19:49 | 06:47 +01:08 | 21:03 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:56 | 27:44 | 07:16 -01:20 | 27:50 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 07:19 | 33:40 | 06:53 +00:26 | 35:06 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:57 | 40:59 | 08:22 -00:25 | 41:59 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 07:34 | 48:56 | 07:10 +00:24 | 50:21 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 56:30 | 05:49 -00:28 | 57:31 -01:01 |
| Running 6 | 07:06 | 01:01:51 | 06:57 +00:09 | 01:03:20 -01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:08:57 | 02:40 +00:09 | 01:10:17 -01:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:58 | 01:11:46 | 06:59 -00:01 | 01:12:57 -01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:45 | 01:18:44 | 06:17 +00:28 | 01:19:56 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:47 | 01:25:29 | 07:44 +00:03 | 01:26:13 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 07:34 | 01:33:16 | 06:45 +00:49 | 01:33:57 -00:41 |
| Roxzone | 09:04 | 01:49:47 | 09:05 -00:01 | 01:49:47 |
Pacing and Profile Analysis:
Emmie's total running time of 00:56:15 is 02:08 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the roxzone. Additionally, her total running time is slower than average, suggesting that she should prioritize training her running skills.
In summary, Emmie Jones had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running segments, specifically Running 3, Running 5, Running 2, and Running 4, she can enhance her overall performance. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, tempo runs, and strength exercises, will help her improve her endurance, speed, and running form. Additionally, working on minimizing transition time in the roxzone and developing mental strategies will contribute to her success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pahlke Chiara | 2018 Hamburg | 01:49:44 | |
| Murphy Joanne | 2024 Dublin | 01:50:12 | |
| Geddis Aoibhinn | 2024 Dublin | 01:50:16 | |
| Taylor Emily | 2024 Manchester | 01:49:33 | |
| Roseweir Natalie | 2023 London | 01:49:41 | |
| Klein Mar | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:50:16 | |
| Wright Kerry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:49 | |
| Parry Helen | 2023 London | 01:50:10 | |
| Mitterrutzner Anja | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:50:01 | |
| Toscano Gabriella | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:50:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
