Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hartgen Natalie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hartgen Natalie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hartgen Natalie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hartgen Natalie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:38 | 45:54 to 44:16 | 36.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 06:43 to 05:13 | 33.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 05:16 to 04:27 | 18.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:54 to 02:29 | 9.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 | 04:27 to 04:18 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Hartgen Natalie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:49 | 05:05 -00:30 | 05:03 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:24 | 05:25 -00:11 | 10:08 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:38 | 02:40 +00:14 | 15:33 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 17:32 | 05:41 -00:09 | 18:13 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 06:43 | 23:04 | 05:36 +01:07 | 23:54 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 29:47 | 05:43 -00:11 | 29:30 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:02 | 35:19 | 05:58 -00:56 | 35:13 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 40:21 | 05:52 +00:08 | 41:11 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 46:21 | 05:19 -00:08 | 47:03 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 51:32 | 05:46 +00:20 | 52:22 -00:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 57:38 | 02:13 -00:12 | 58:08 -00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 59:39 | 05:44 +00:13 | 01:00:21 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:16 | 01:05:36 | 04:39 +00:37 | 01:06:05 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:48 | 01:10:52 | 06:05 +00:43 | 01:10:44 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:27 | 01:17:40 | 04:49 -00:22 | 01:16:49 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 06:14 | 01:28:13 | 06:35 -00:21 | 01:28:13 |
Natalie's total running time of 00:45:54 was 01:59 slower than the average. This indicates that she could focus on improving her running performance to enhance her overall race time. However, it's important to note that her best running lap was 00:04:49, which was 00:02 faster than the average. This suggests that she has the potential to excel in running if she focuses on specific training strategies.
Overall, Natalie Hartgen had an impressive performance in the Hyrox race in Birmingham. By focusing on the identified areas for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance in future races. With continued dedication and targeted training, Natalie has the potential to achieve even greater success in her fitness journey.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas Lauren | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:42 | |
| Alexander Jo | 2022 Manchester | 01:27:51 | |
| Henshilwood Rachael | 2023 London | 01:27:52 | |
| Holmes Jessie | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:24 | |
| O Sullivan Leah | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:30 | |
| Garcia Cece | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:28:00 | |
| Capstaff Katie | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:22 | |
| Romano Bethany | 2023 Chicago | 01:28:24 | |
| Vissers Marle | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:27 | |
| Gajda Natalia | 2024 Poznan | 01:27:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:22:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
