Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 923 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gunn Angela's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gunn Angela's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gunn Angela's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gunn Angela's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:36 | 43:07 to 39:31 | 83.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 04:49 to 04:22 | 10.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 03:58 to 03:43 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Gunn Angela | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:13 | 04:52 -00:12 | 04:38 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 09:53 | 04:54 +00:18 | 09:30 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 01:44 | 15:05 | 02:27 -00:43 | 14:24 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:49 | 05:10 +00:05 | 16:51 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 22:04 | 04:56 -00:07 | 22:01 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 26:53 | 05:10 +00:19 | 26:57 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:38 | 32:22 | 05:02 -01:24 | 32:07 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 36:00 | 05:16 +00:10 | 37:09 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 41:26 | 05:06 -00:10 | 42:25 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 46:22 | 05:12 +00:08 | 47:31 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 51:42 | 02:01 -00:23 | 52:43 -01:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 53:20 | 05:10 +00:19 | 54:44 -01:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 58:49 | 04:06 -00:08 | 59:54 -01:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:02:47 | 05:27 +00:20 | 01:04:00 -01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 03:17 | 01:08:34 | 04:07 -00:50 | 01:09:27 -00:53 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:19:10 | 05:36 +01:52 | 01:19:10 |
Angela Gunn delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing the 108th overall rank and the 25th rank in her age group, placing her in the top 5% and top 6% respectively. Her overall time of 01:19:10 reflects a strong competition level, especially with impressive strength events such as the Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, and Farmers Carry, where she ranked in the top 4 percentile. However, her total running time of 00:43:07 was 01:42 slower than the average, indicating an area needing improvement. The pacing across the initial running segments suggests a slightly conservative start, as her times were consistently slower than average. The Roxzone transitions also require attention, taking 02:06 longer than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Pippa | 2024 London | 01:19:22 | |
| Kennedy Molly | 2019 New York | 01:19:09 | |
| Corbett Leondra | 2024 Perth | 01:19:40 | |
| Orlowski Tina | 2023 München | 01:18:47 | |
| Mcdaid Michelle | 2024 Berlin | 01:18:52 | |
| Merget Lisa | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:18:59 | |
| Serna Mapi | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:18:44 | |
| Slieker Philipa | 2023 Manchester | 01:19:37 | |
| Allen Radka | 2023 Birmingham | 01:19:12 | |
| Heywood Laura | 2021 Birmingham | 01:18:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Perth | 01:18:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
