Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gibbs Nicholas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gibbs Nicholas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gibbs Nicholas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gibbs Nicholas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:40 | 08:20 to 05:40 | 42.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:01 | 06:40 to 04:39 | 32.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 02:35 to 01:57 | 10.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 05:09 to 04:33 | 9.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:42 to 04:22 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:19 to 04:18 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:56 to 38:56 | 0.0% |
| Gibbs Nicholas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:24 | 04:23 -00:04 | 04:29 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:12 | 08:43 | 04:49 -00:37 | 08:52 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 01:40 | 12:55 | 02:48 -01:08 | 13:41 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 14:35 | 05:13 -00:36 | 16:29 -01:54 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 19:12 | 04:42 +00:00 | 21:42 -02:30 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 23:54 | 05:11 -00:16 | 26:24 -02:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 28:49 | 05:00 +01:40 | 31:35 -02:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:56 | 35:29 | 05:21 -00:25 | 36:35 -01:06 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 40:25 | 04:44 -00:06 | 41:56 -01:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 45:03 | 05:14 -00:12 | 46:40 -01:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:35 | 50:05 | 02:07 +00:28 | 51:54 -01:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 52:40 | 05:12 -00:06 | 54:01 -01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 57:46 | 04:51 +00:18 | 59:13 -01:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:02:55 | 05:43 +00:04 | 01:04:04 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:08:42 | 06:11 +02:09 | 01:09:47 -01:05 |
| Roxzone | 05:27 | 01:22:23 | 06:25 -00:58 | 01:22:23 |
Nicholas Gibbs delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, securing an overall rank in the top 24% and an age group rank in the top 26%. His total running time was 2:35 faster than average, indicating a strong running ability and suggesting a runner profile. The consistent outperformance in running segments, particularly Running 2 and Running 3, indicates a well-paced start. However, his strength segments, such as Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, were notably slower than average, suggesting areas for improvement in strength endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Doyle Seamus | 2022 London | 01:22:52 | |
| James Anthony | 2023 Malmö | 01:22:32 | |
| Weulink Mees | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:14 | |
| Cabiddu Ivan | 2022 Madrid | 01:22:08 | |
| Kiraly Laszlo | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:07 | |
| Loh Guo Pei | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:22:53 | |
| Beskers John | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:16 | |
| Unger Christian | 2024 Berlin | 01:22:30 | |
| Treanor Aidan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:22:03 | |
| Greiff Felix | 2024 Köln | 01:22:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
