Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Gear Andrew's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Gear Andrew hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Gear Andrew’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gear Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:58 | 06:16 to 04:18 | 40.3% |
| Run Total | 01:31 | 40:13 to 38:42 | 31.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:56 | 05:16 to 04:20 | 19.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 05:44 to 05:19 | 8.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:54 to 01:51 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Gear Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:21 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:58 | 04:32 | 04:20 -00:22 | 04:21 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 08:30 | 04:41 -00:18 | 08:41 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 12:53 | 02:41 -00:27 | 13:22 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 15:07 | 05:04 -00:18 | 16:03 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 03:49 | 19:53 | 04:29 -00:40 | 21:07 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 23:42 | 05:03 -00:24 | 25:36 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:16 | 28:21 | 04:46 +00:30 | 30:39 -02:18 |
| Running 5 | 07:03 | 33:37 | 05:11 +01:52 | 35:25 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 40:40 | 04:40 -00:08 | 40:36 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 45:12 | 05:04 -00:09 | 45:16 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 50:07 | 02:02 -00:08 | 50:20 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 52:01 | 05:03 -00:05 | 52:22 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:16 | 56:59 | 04:38 +01:38 | 57:25 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:59 | 01:03:15 | 05:31 -00:32 | 01:02:03 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:44 | 01:08:14 | 05:51 -00:07 | 01:07:34 +00:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:19:26 | 06:01 -00:26 | 01:19:26 |
Andrew Gear delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking 324th overall, placing him in the top 17% of competitors. Within his age category, he finished 72nd, placing him in the top 19%. His total running time was 00:40:13, which is 00:04 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. Andrew's pacing analysis indicates a consistent running performance, with his earlier segments starting slightly slower than average but gaining speed as the race progressed, suggesting effective energy management. His performance profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, with a stronger inclination towards running, as he consistently outperformed the average in running segments, but has room for improvement in certain strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Elliott James | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:01 | |
| Waeterloos Anjouan | 2024 Paris | 01:19:31 | |
| Slater Chris | 2022 Dallas | 01:19:10 | |
| Maldonado Gimenez Pau | 2021 Madrid | 01:18:57 | |
| Lebsak Gleb | 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:50 | |
| Fonseca Andrés | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:19:46 | |
| Coy Edward | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:35 | |
| Plötz Ole | 2018 Hamburg | 01:19:33 | |
| Suter Fabian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:26 | |
| Elsharbaty Abdelrahman | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
