Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lebsak Gleb's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lebsak Gleb's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lebsak Gleb's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lebsak Gleb's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 | 44:20 to 39:04 | 98.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:19 to 04:15 | 1.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:53 to 01:52 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Lebsak Gleb | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 04:22 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:18 | 04:21 -00:02 | 04:22 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 09:37 | 04:42 +00:29 | 08:43 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 14:48 | 02:43 -00:22 | 13:25 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 17:09 | 05:05 +00:31 | 16:08 +01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 22:45 | 04:32 -00:44 | 21:13 +01:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 26:33 | 05:04 +00:30 | 25:45 +00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 32:07 | 04:47 -00:30 | 30:49 +01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 36:24 | 05:13 +00:16 | 35:36 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 41:53 | 04:40 -00:07 | 40:49 +01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 46:26 | 05:05 +00:27 | 45:29 +00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 51:58 | 02:02 -00:09 | 50:34 +01:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 53:51 | 05:04 +00:33 | 52:36 +01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:49 | 59:28 | 04:40 -00:51 | 57:40 +01:48 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:03:17 | 05:32 +00:35 | 01:02:20 +00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:09:24 | 05:53 -01:07 | 01:07:52 +01:32 |
| Roxzone | 05:48 | 01:19:50 | 06:05 -00:17 | 01:19:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Gleb struggled in the running segments. His total running time of 00:44:20 was 05:41 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. Additionally, his running splits (Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8) were consistently slower than the average, with variations ranging from 00:19 to 01:05 slower.
Training Strategies and Techniques:
1. Interval Training: Incorporate interval training sessions to improve running speed and endurance. This can be done by alternating between high-intensity sprints and recovery periods. For example, Gleb can perform 400-meter sprints followed by a 200-meter recovery jog. Gradually increase the intensity and duration of the sprints over time.
2. Hill Training: Include hill sprints or hill repeats in Gleb's training routine to build strength and improve running efficiency. Find a hill with a moderate to steep incline and sprint up it, focusing on driving the knees, pumping the arms, and maintaining good posture. Recover by walking or jogging downhill and repeat for several sets.
3. Tempo Runs: Incorporate tempo runs into Gleb's training schedule to improve his overall running pace. A tempo run involves running at a comfortably hard pace for an extended period, typically around 20-30 minutes. This will help improve Gleb's aerobic capacity and running economy.
4. Strength Training: Include strength training exercises that target the muscles used in running, such as squats, lunges, and calf raises. This will help improve Gleb's power and efficiency while running.
5. Form Correction: Evaluate Gleb's running form and make any necessary adjustments. Focus on maintaining an upright posture, landing mid-foot, and driving the arms in a controlled and efficient manner. Consider working with a running coach to ensure proper form and technique.
By implementing these training strategies, techniques, and race strategies, Gleb can improve his overall performance and decrease the time lost in the running segments. It is important to tailor the training program to his specific needs, considering his age group, nationality, and overall rank. Regular monitoring and adjustments to the training routine will be crucial to track progress and ensure continuous improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Danny | 2023 Manchester | 01:19:34 | |
| Lohse Holger | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:19:23 | |
| Licini Liam | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:30 | |
| Voogd Lennard | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:38 | |
| Von Hadeln Gino | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:56 | |
| Lauer Frank | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:20:18 | |
| Kraushofer Peter | 2019 Wien | 01:19:57 | |
| Love Steven | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:17 | |
| Mcguigan Stevie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:35 | |
| Van Blunk Eric | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:19:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:09 | |
| 2024 Berlin | 01:15:52 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
