Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ferraro Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ferraro Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ferraro Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ferraro Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:45 | 46:50 to 46:05 | 55.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:19 | 07:35 to 07:16 | 23.5% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:12 to 04:59 | 16.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 05:30 to 05:26 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:00 to 06:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Ferraro Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:50 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:50 | 04:36 -00:07 | 04:58 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 09:19 | 05:23 +00:15 | 09:34 -00:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 14:57 | 03:14 -00:30 | 14:57 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 17:41 | 05:53 -00:09 | 18:11 -00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:30 | 23:25 | 05:36 -00:06 | 24:04 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 28:55 | 05:54 -00:01 | 29:40 -00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 34:48 | 06:19 -00:19 | 35:34 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 40:48 | 06:08 -00:13 | 41:53 -01:05 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 46:43 | 05:03 +00:09 | 48:01 -01:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 51:55 | 05:56 +00:00 | 53:04 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 57:51 | 02:27 -00:08 | 59:00 -01:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 01:00:10 | 05:55 -00:04 | 01:01:27 -01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:06:01 | 05:54 -00:22 | 01:07:22 -01:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:07 | 01:11:33 | 06:49 +00:18 | 01:13:16 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:18:40 | 07:40 -00:05 | 01:20:05 -01:25 |
| Roxzone | 09:47 | 01:35:54 | 08:09 +01:38 | 01:35:54 |
Frank Ferraro delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 45% overall and top 42% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running ability and a runner-oriented profile. However, his pacing strategy could have been more evenly distributed, as he started relatively fast and gradually slowed down by Running 8. His strength exercises, though mostly above average, suggest room for improvement, especially in compromised running scenarios after specific strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mchugh Ty | 2023 New York | 01:36:24 | |
| Santos Adrian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:59 | |
| Gerlach Jonas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:35:30 | |
| Sellschopp Elliot | 2024 Hamburg | 01:36:14 | |
| Gödde Martin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:19 | |
| Chee Cavan | 2024 Singapore | 01:36:17 | |
| Greenwood Ryan | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:06 | |
| Vervloet Laurence | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:36:18 | |
| Van Hees Fedde | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:36:16 | |
| Weber Joost | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
