Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
Compare With Another Athlete
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:53 (From 48:57 to 46:04) | 64.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:20 (From 07:00 to 05:40) | 29.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 (From 07:25 to 07:16) | 3.3% |
| BBJ | 00:08 (From 06:12 to 06:04) | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:15 to 04:15) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:14 to 02:14) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:43 to 04:43) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:49 to 04:49) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:08 to 02:08) | 0.0% |
| Erving Jamie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:30 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:30 | 04:37 -00:22 | 05:00 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 08:45 | 05:24 -00:05 | 09:37 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 14:04 | 03:14 -01:00 | 15:01 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:24 | 16:18 | 05:54 +00:30 | 18:15 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 22:42 | 05:39 -00:56 | 24:09 -01:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 27:25 | 05:54 +00:05 | 29:48 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:12 | 33:24 | 06:20 -00:08 | 35:42 -02:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 39:36 | 06:08 +00:20 | 42:02 -02:26 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 46:04 | 05:03 -00:14 | 48:10 -02:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 50:53 | 05:56 +00:30 | 53:13 -02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 57:19 | 02:26 -00:18 | 59:09 -01:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 59:27 | 05:56 +00:28 | 01:01:35 -02:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:00 | 01:05:51 | 05:54 +01:06 | 01:07:31 -01:40 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:12:51 | 06:48 +00:42 | 01:13:25 -00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:20:21 | 07:40 -00:15 | 01:20:13 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:27 | 01:36:06 | 08:13 +00:14 | 01:36:06 |
Jamie Erving delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 45% overall and the top 48% within his age group. His total running time was slightly slower than average by 1 minute and 33 seconds, suggesting room for improvement in running, as he shows a stronger profile in strength-based exercises. Jamie's initial running segments indicate that he started at a competitive pace, but his performance in later running segments suggests potential fatigue or pacing issues. Notably, he excelled in strength-based tasks such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, which were significantly faster than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Toth Andras | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:37 | |
| Paulini Alexander | 2021 Leipzig | 01:35:58 | |
| Dwars Thomas | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:36:00 | |
| Nicoletti Giovanni | 2024 Milan | 01:36:25 | |
| Malkera Mohammad | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:25 | |
| Styles Rob | 2024 London | 01:35:38 | |
| Chopra Mannat | 2024 Paris | 01:35:48 | |
| Dimmendaal Gerben | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:00 | |
| Koegelenberg Rudolph | 2024 Cape Town | 01:35:55 | |
| Hofer Johannes | 2023 München | 01:36:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Erving Jamie
