Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Buffery Jake's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Buffery Jake's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Buffery Jake's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Buffery Jake's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:22 | 47:02 to 42:40 | 75.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:38 | 06:57 to 06:19 | 11.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 05:12 to 04:49 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:21 to 02:07 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:35 to 04:26 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Buffery Jake | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 04:41 +01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 06:16 | 04:29 +00:06 | 04:41 +01:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 10:51 | 05:04 +00:17 | 09:10 +01:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 16:12 | 02:59 -00:10 | 14:14 +01:58 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 19:01 | 05:31 +00:31 | 17:13 +01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 25:03 | 05:05 +00:07 | 22:44 +02:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 30:15 | 05:29 +00:33 | 27:49 +02:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:05 | 36:17 | 05:33 -01:28 | 33:18 +02:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 40:22 | 05:41 +00:26 | 38:51 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 46:29 | 04:52 -00:05 | 44:32 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 51:16 | 05:32 +00:07 | 49:24 +01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:55 | 02:14 +00:07 | 54:56 +01:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 59:16 | 05:31 -00:02 | 57:10 +02:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:35 | 01:04:45 | 05:17 -01:42 | 01:02:41 +02:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:08:20 | 06:09 +00:01 | 01:07:58 +00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 06:57 | 01:14:30 | 06:46 +00:11 | 01:14:07 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:40 | 01:27:59 | 07:06 -00:26 | 01:27:59 |
In terms of his splits, Jake struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 4, Running 3, Running 5, and Running 2. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race. However, he had a strong performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he gained time compared to the average.
Jake's Total running time of 00:47:02 was 05:08 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time. His Best running Lap time of 00:05:21 suggests that he has the potential to improve his speed and pacing.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Jake Buffery can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hackett Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:14 | |
| Theeuwes Jaap | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:58 | |
| Badilla Fernando | 2022 Valencia | 01:28:02 | |
| Fotland Øystein | 2022 London | 01:27:58 | |
| Trujillo Enrique | 2024 Mexico City | 01:27:53 | |
| Bürger Mario | 2022 Hamburg | 01:28:03 | |
| Dangi Cedric | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:12 | |
| Mitchell Lewis | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:45 | |
| Legg Matthew | 2024 Dubai | 01:28:12 | |
| Kunde Kai | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:27:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
