Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dangi Cedric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dangi Cedric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dangi Cedric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dangi Cedric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 45:54 to 42:40 | 63.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 06:41 to 05:14 | 28.2% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:09 to 04:47 | 7.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 05:06 to 05:01 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Dangi Cedric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 04:42 +01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:42 | 04:29 -00:14 | 04:42 +01:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 09:57 | 05:05 +00:16 | 09:11 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 15:18 | 02:59 -00:37 | 14:16 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 17:40 | 05:33 +00:09 | 17:15 +00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 03:40 | 23:22 | 05:05 -01:25 | 22:48 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 27:02 | 05:31 +00:15 | 27:53 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:41 | 32:48 | 05:34 +01:07 | 33:24 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 39:29 | 05:42 +00:38 | 38:58 +00:31 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 45:49 | 04:52 +00:17 | 44:40 +01:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 50:58 | 05:33 +00:00 | 49:32 +01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 56:31 | 02:14 -00:22 | 55:05 +01:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 58:23 | 05:32 -00:29 | 57:19 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:03:26 | 05:18 -00:12 | 01:02:51 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:08:32 | 06:11 +00:19 | 01:08:09 +00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 04:34 | 01:15:02 | 06:46 -02:12 | 01:14:20 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 08:43 | 01:28:12 | 07:06 +01:37 | 01:28:12 |
Cedric Dangi delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 39% overall and top 44% in his age group. His total running time was slightly slower than the average, indicating that while he possesses a decent running capability, there is room for improvement. Notably, Cedric's strength segments, such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, were significantly above average, showcasing his strength-oriented profile. His pacing strategy started conservatively and remained consistent, with a slight slowdown in the middle segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reckel Jonas | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:27:47 | |
| Gawinecki Mateusz | 2024 Gdansk | 01:27:51 | |
| Johnson Mario | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:28:26 | |
| Mccully Oliver Mccully | 2023 London | 01:27:55 | |
| Schultz Rico | 2021 Berlin | 01:28:37 | |
| Sadegh Mahdi | 2024 Stockholm | 01:27:46 | |
| Cooke Benjamin | 2022 London | 01:28:12 | |
| Flight Ross | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:31 | |
| De Casas David | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:36 | |
| Lawrence Glenn | 2023 London | 01:28:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
