Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 835 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Armstrong Steph's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Armstrong Steph's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Armstrong Steph's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armstrong Steph's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:21 | 06:37 to 04:16 | 38.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:23 | 05:00 to 03:37 | 22.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:53 | 04:12 to 03:19 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 02:35 to 02:00 | 9.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:18 to 01:47 | 8.5% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:05 to 04:54 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:49 to 04:40 | 2.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:15 to 38:15 | 0.0% |
| Armstrong Steph | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 04:37 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 04:03 | 04:51 -00:02 | 04:37 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 08:52 | 04:52 -00:27 | 09:28 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 13:17 | 02:23 +00:12 | 14:20 -01:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 15:52 | 05:06 -00:22 | 16:43 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 06:37 | 20:36 | 04:49 +01:48 | 21:49 -01:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 27:13 | 05:07 -00:21 | 26:38 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:08 | 31:59 | 04:52 -00:44 | 31:45 +00:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:53 | 36:07 | 05:12 -00:19 | 36:37 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 41:00 | 05:03 +00:02 | 41:49 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 46:05 | 05:09 -00:09 | 46:52 -00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 51:05 | 01:59 +00:19 | 52:01 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 53:23 | 05:07 -00:22 | 54:00 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 58:08 | 04:01 +00:59 | 59:07 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:43 | 01:03:08 | 05:24 +00:19 | 01:03:08 +00:00 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:08:51 | 03:59 +00:13 | 01:08:32 +00:19 |
| Roxzone | 05:11 | 01:18:05 | 05:34 -00:23 | 01:18:05 |
Steph Armstrong delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking 84th overall out of 1801 athletes, placing her in the top 4%. She also ranked 16th in her age group, showcasing her competitive edge. Her total running time was 00:38:15, which was 02:42 faster than the average, indicating a proficient runner profile. This suggests that she excels in running, but may benefit from focusing on strength training to complement her running skills further. The initial running segments, particularly Running 1 through Running 4, show that Steph started with a consistent pace, neither too fast nor too slow, which is commendable for energy conservation throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pye Kea | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:37 | |
| Marx Beate | 2021 Hamburg | 01:18:32 | |
| Hayes Denise | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:11 | |
| CoulsonBascombe Daisy | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:39 | |
| Makhsani Orianne | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:18 | |
| Vermeulen Mariska | 2024 Maastricht | 01:18:07 | |
| Huse Julia | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:17:45 | |
| French Ashley | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:52 | |
| Da Costa Peixoto Vivienne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:27 | |
| Rovers Gabrielle | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:17:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
