Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 820 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rovers Gabrielle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rovers Gabrielle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rovers Gabrielle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rovers Gabrielle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 40:31 to 38:34 | 41.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 04:09 to 03:35 | 12.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:28 | 03:44 to 03:16 | 9.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 02:26 to 01:59 | 9.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:12 to 01:46 | 9.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:03 to 04:39 | 8.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 04:27 to 04:12 | 5.3% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:05 to 04:53 | 4.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Rovers Gabrielle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:37 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 04:43 | 04:51 +00:12 | 04:37 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 09:46 | 04:49 -00:03 | 09:28 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:32 | 02:24 +00:02 | 14:17 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 16:58 | 05:04 -00:02 | 16:41 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 22:00 | 04:48 -00:21 | 21:45 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:08 | 26:27 | 05:05 +00:03 | 26:33 -00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 31:35 | 04:49 -00:57 | 31:38 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 35:27 | 05:11 +00:00 | 36:27 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 40:38 | 05:04 +00:01 | 41:38 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 45:43 | 05:07 -00:03 | 46:42 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 50:47 | 01:59 +00:13 | 51:49 -01:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 52:59 | 05:05 -00:05 | 53:48 -00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 57:59 | 03:58 +00:11 | 58:53 -00:54 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:02:08 | 05:23 +00:17 | 01:02:51 -00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 03:44 | 01:07:48 | 03:57 -00:13 | 01:08:14 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 06:13 | 01:17:40 | 05:29 +00:44 | 01:17:40 |
However, there are a few areas where Gabrielle can focus on for improvement. Her total running time of 00:40:31 was 01:33 slower than the average, indicating that she could benefit from enhancing her overall fitness and reducing transition time. Additionally, her best running lap was 00:04:43, which was 00:18 slower than the average.
In conclusion, Gabrielle Rovers demonstrated impressive performance in the Hyrox race, but there are specific areas where she can further excel. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her overall performance and reach new levels of success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wenzel Annika | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:00 | |
| Doyle Chloe | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:08 | |
| Horton Kirsty | 2023 London | 01:17:38 | |
| Mahany Sara | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:20 | |
| CoulsonBascombe Daisy | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:39 | |
| Hash Lauren | 2022 Dallas | 01:17:11 | |
| Satow Britta | 2024 Köln | 01:18:07 | |
| Quinke Loreen | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:03 | |
| Jones Kirsty | 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:14 | |
| Sterzing Yvonne | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:17:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:21:42 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:22:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
