Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 402 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Anjamani Jay's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Anjamani Jay's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Anjamani Jay's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Anjamani Jay's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:01 | 01:01:34 to 55:33 | 70.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:16 | 09:52 to 07:36 | 26.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 07:20 to 07:10 | 2.0% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:33 to 05:31 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:50 to 06:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:00 to 03:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:45 to 08:45 | 0.0% |
| Anjamani Jay | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:06 | 00:00 | 05:54 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 06:06 | 04:58 -00:10 | 05:54 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 06:54 | 10:54 | 06:24 +00:30 | 10:52 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 17:48 | 04:05 -00:55 | 17:16 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 07:38 | 20:58 | 07:14 +00:24 | 21:21 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 07:20 | 28:36 | 07:18 +00:02 | 28:35 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 07:32 | 35:56 | 07:18 +00:14 | 35:53 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:50 | 43:28 | 08:26 -01:36 | 43:11 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 07:45 | 50:18 | 07:46 -00:01 | 51:37 -01:19 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 58:03 | 05:33 +00:00 | 59:23 -01:20 |
| Running 6 | 07:55 | 01:03:36 | 07:22 +00:33 | 01:04:56 -01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 01:11:31 | 02:58 +00:02 | 01:12:18 -00:47 |
| Running 7 | 08:01 | 01:14:31 | 07:25 +00:36 | 01:15:16 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:52 | 01:22:32 | 07:57 +01:55 | 01:22:41 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 09:47 | 01:32:24 | 09:37 +00:10 | 01:30:38 +01:46 |
| Wall Balls | 08:45 | 01:42:11 | 10:11 -01:26 | 01:40:15 +01:56 |
| Roxzone | 10:43 | 02:01:31 | 11:05 -00:22 | 02:01:31 |
Jay Anjamani demonstrated a commendable effort in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing at 02:01:31 and placing in the top 60% overall. His rank in the age group was 256 out of 378, placing him in the top 67% of his category. Notably, Jay showed a strong aptitude for strength-based activities, with significant time gains in the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump. However, his overall running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that his strength profile might be more developed than his running abilities. The first half of his running segments suggests a slightly conservative start, which may have impacted his total running time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Riding Stuart | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:04 | |
| Hanley Alex | 2022 Birmingham | 02:01:53 | |
| Pangilinan Keith | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:01:12 | |
| Mullen John | 2024 Dublin | 02:01:04 | |
| Alarcon Victor | 2022 New York | 02:01:21 | |
| Schwarzkopf Philip | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 02:01:23 | |
| Ang Ronald | 2023 Melbourne | 02:01:15 | |
| Gillespie Chris | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:01 | |
| Maher Niall | 2024 Dublin | 02:01:52 | |
| Castellani Emanuele | 2024 Milan | 02:01:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:39:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
