Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Delft Maarten's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Delft Maarten's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Delft Maarten's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Delft Maarten's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 40:57 to 38:42 | 48.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:34 | 06:53 to 05:19 | 33.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:42 | 03:06 to 02:24 | 15.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:23 to 04:14 | 3.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:28 to 01:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Van Delft Maarten | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:35 | 04:20 +00:03 | 04:20 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 07:58 | 04:41 +00:20 | 08:40 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 12:59 | 02:41 +00:25 | 13:21 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 16:05 | 05:04 +00:05 | 16:02 +00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 21:14 | 04:30 -00:24 | 21:06 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 25:20 | 05:04 +00:03 | 25:36 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 30:27 | 04:46 -00:44 | 30:40 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 34:29 | 05:12 +00:09 | 35:26 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 39:50 | 04:40 -00:12 | 40:38 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 44:18 | 05:04 +00:16 | 45:18 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:28 | 49:38 | 02:01 -00:33 | 50:22 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 51:06 | 05:03 +00:18 | 52:23 -01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 56:27 | 04:38 -00:30 | 57:26 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:00:35 | 05:32 +00:34 | 01:02:04 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:06:41 | 05:51 +01:02 | 01:07:36 -00:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:02 | 01:19:29 | 06:02 +00:00 | 01:19:29 |
In terms of his splits, Maarten performed particularly well in the running 1 segment, completing it in 00:03:35, which was 00:37 faster than the average time. This indicates that he has a good running ability and pace. Additionally, his time in the sled pull segment was 00:41 faster than average, showing strength and efficiency in this exercise.
However, there are areas of improvement for Maarten to focus on in order to enhance his overall performance. The segments with the most time lost were the run total, wall balls, running 8, running 2, running 7, running 6, and running 5. These segments should be the main focus for improving his race performance.
In conclusion, Maarten Van Delft had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his running times, building upper body strength, and optimizing his transitions, Maarten can further elevate his performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, as outlined above, will help him achieve his goals and continue to excel in the sport.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odum Kuba | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:31 | |
| Lake Marcus | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:58 | |
| Stanley Keegan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:55 | |
| Scharr Sven | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:19:10 | |
| Sorgente Claudio | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:18:59 | |
| Grime Peter | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:35 | |
| Baldry Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:22 | |
| Becker Stefan | 2023 Hannover | 01:19:33 | |
| Buckler James | 2023 London | 01:19:02 | |
| Häckner Maximilian | 2023 München | 01:19:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:14:15 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
