Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schenck Elizabeth's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schenck Elizabeth's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schenck Elizabeth's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schenck Elizabeth's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:58 | 08:23 to 05:25 | 49.6% |
| Run Total | 01:56 | 47:17 to 45:21 | 32.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:45 | 03:20 to 02:35 | 12.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 05:23 to 05:03 | 5.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Schenck Elizabeth | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 04:45 | 05:09 +00:14 | 05:10 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 10:08 | 05:30 +00:24 | 10:19 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 16:02 | 02:45 +00:35 | 15:49 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 19:22 | 05:48 +00:30 | 18:34 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 08:23 | 25:40 | 05:51 +02:32 | 24:22 +01:18 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 34:03 | 05:50 +00:14 | 30:13 +03:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:12 | 40:07 | 06:13 -02:01 | 36:03 +04:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 44:19 | 05:57 +00:04 | 42:16 +02:03 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 50:20 | 05:24 -00:16 | 48:13 +02:07 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 55:28 | 05:52 +00:13 | 53:37 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 01:01:33 | 02:15 -00:18 | 59:29 +02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 01:03:30 | 05:51 +00:06 | 01:01:44 +01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 01:09:27 | 04:52 -00:54 | 01:07:35 +01:52 |
| Running 8 | 06:16 | 01:13:25 | 06:16 +00:00 | 01:12:27 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 03:05 | 01:19:41 | 04:59 -01:54 | 01:18:43 +00:58 |
| Roxzone | 07:59 | 01:30:38 | 06:56 +01:03 | 01:30:38 |
Splits Analysis:
- Elizabeth performed exceptionally well in the running 1 segment, completing it in 00:04:45, which was 00:17 faster than the average time.
- However, she struggled in several segments, including the ski erg, running 2, sled push, running 3, sled pull, running 4, running 6, and the roxzone. In these segments, she was slower than the average time.
- Notably, Elizabeth performed exceptionally well in the burpees broad jump, rowing, farmers carry, sandbag lunges, and wall balls segments, where she was faster than the average time.
Overall, Elizabeth Schenck had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, with notable strengths in certain segments. By focusing on improving her weaknesses, implementing specific training strategies, and utilizing effective race strategies, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver Lucy | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:26 | |
| Altun Caroline | 2024 Stockholm | 01:30:09 | |
| Scherzer Mia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:45 | |
| Bennett Belinda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:22 | |
| Heron Nadine | 2023 London | 01:30:14 | |
| Bennett Emma | 2022 Birmingham | 01:30:17 | |
| Makowiec Paulina | 2024 Gdansk | 01:30:19 | |
| Peele Emily | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:30:57 | |
| Audley Philippa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:57 | |
| Van Polen Vera | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
