Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Van Polen Vera's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Polen Vera's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Polen Vera's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Polen Vera's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:54.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Vera Van Polen delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 13% of all participants and top 11% in her age group. This indicates a strong competitive edge. Despite this achievement, Vera's overall time of 01:30:11, with a total running time of 00:50:34, was slower than the average by 03:46, suggesting room for improvement in running efficiency. Vera demonstrated significant strength in strength-based events, ranking in the top percentiles for Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges, indicating a hybrid profile with a slight skew towards strength. Notably, Vera started the race conservatively with the initial running segments slower than average, suggesting a pacing strategy that might have been too cautious.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Vera's running time was slower than average, highlighting the need for enhanced cardiovascular endurance and pacing strategies.
Training Strategy: Incorporate interval training to improve speed and endurance. Include fartlek sessions and tempo runs to build pace consistency.
Exercises: Long-distance runs (8-10km) at a steady pace, coupled with short, intense sprints (200m intervals with 1-minute recovery).
Wall Balls: Ranking in the 92nd percentile indicates this was a challenging segment.
Training Strategy: Focus on technique and endurance in wall balls to reduce time and effort.
Exercises: High-rep wall ball sets (3x20), squat-to-press drills, and plyometric exercises to improve explosive strength.
Technique Correction: Ensure the use of proper form – full depth squat, use of legs to power the throw, and efficient ball catch and release.
Training Strategy: Improve burpee efficiency and explosive power for broad jumps.
Exercises: Burpee intervals (5 sets of 10 with 30-second rest), box jumps, and plyometric lunges.
Roxzone: Although faster than average, further improvement could optimize transition times.
Training Strategy: Practice quick transitions between exercise stations to minimize downtime.
Exercises: Circuit training focusing on quick set changes, and drills that simulate race conditions.
Race Strategies
Optimize Pacing: Start the race with a slightly faster pace that can be sustained, especially during the first four running segments. This can prevent time loss and build a buffer for later segments.
Transition Efficiency: Focus on reducing time spent in the roxzone by rehearsing transitions and minimizing rest between segments.
Energy Management: Balance energy expenditure by alternating between high-intensity efforts and recovery segments, ensuring consistent performance throughout the race.
Mental Focus: Maintain concentration during strength segments to avoid unnecessary errors and ensure efficient form and technique.