Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Peele Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peele Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peele Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peele Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:16.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Emily Peele performed exceptionally well in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, ranking in the top 18% of both her age group (35-39) and overall athletes. Her overall time was 01:30:57, which is a commendable achievement. However, her total running time was 00:48:31, which is 01:49 slower than average. This indicates that Emily has a more strength-based profile, excelling in strength components, such as the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges, but requiring further improvement in her running efficiency and endurance. Her fastest running lap was 00:06:01, showing potential for improved running performance.
Emily started the race at a fast pace, with her Running 1 time being 00:59 faster than average. However, as the race progressed, her running times decreased in efficiency, pointing to a potential issue with pacing and maintaining stamina throughout the race. This is also supported by her slower Roxzone time, which suggests that she took longer rest periods or transitions between exercises.
Segments to Improve:
Run Total: Emily's total running time was 3 minutes and 34 seconds slower than the 25th percentile. This indicates that she needs to focus on improving her running stamina and efficiency. Incorporating interval training, which alternates between high-intensity and low-intensity running, can help boost her endurance. Fartlek sessions, combining steady-state running with bursts of faster running, can also be beneficial. Long, slow runs will further help in building endurance.
Roxzone: With a time slower than average by 2 minutes and 6 seconds, Emily needs to optimize her rest and transition periods. Focused training on quick recovery and transition, such as circuit training where you quickly move from one exercise to another, can help improve this. Practicing transitions between different exercises can also prove beneficial.
Wall Balls: Emily's Wall Balls segment was 47 seconds slower than the 25th percentile. She should work on her explosive strength and coordination for this exercise. Incorporating plyometric exercises like box jumps and ball slams can help. Squat training, focusing on form and depth, can also improve her Wall Balls performance.
Race Strategies:
For better performance, Emily should consider adjusting her pacing strategy. Starting the race at a slightly slower pace might allow her to maintain stamina for later stages of the race and improve her overall running time. Additionally, working on transition speed and recovery time can help reduce her Roxzone time. Finally, focusing on form and technique in strength exercises like Wall Balls can lead to significant improvements in those segments.