Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 822 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcgee Tamala's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcgee Tamala's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcgee Tamala's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcgee Tamala's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:12 | 08:54 to 05:42 | 53.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:42 | 08:04 to 06:22 | 28.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:48 to 02:25 | 6.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 07:23 to 07:06 | 4.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:40 to 05:25 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:09 to 03:01 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:12 to 47:12 | 0.0% |
| Mcgee Tamala | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 05:34 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:11 | 05:31 | 05:21 -00:10 | 05:34 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 10:42 | 06:02 -01:15 | 10:55 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 15:29 | 03:04 +00:05 | 16:57 -01:28 |
| Running 3 | 09:41 | 18:38 | 06:22 +03:19 | 20:01 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 08:04 | 28:19 | 06:36 +01:28 | 26:23 +01:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 36:23 | 06:26 -01:06 | 32:59 +03:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:23 | 41:43 | 07:18 +00:05 | 39:25 +02:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:27 | 49:06 | 06:37 -01:10 | 46:43 +02:23 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 54:33 | 05:40 -00:29 | 53:20 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 59:44 | 06:29 -01:07 | 59:00 +00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 01:05:06 | 02:30 +00:18 | 01:05:29 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 01:07:54 | 06:28 -01:05 | 01:07:59 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:13:17 | 05:37 +00:03 | 01:14:27 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:18:57 | 07:09 -01:25 | 01:20:04 -01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 08:54 | 01:24:41 | 05:57 +02:57 | 01:27:13 -02:32 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:41:27 | 08:17 -00:17 | 01:41:27 |
Tamala Mcgee, in the 50-54 age group, showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. Ranking 945 overall, she secured a place in the top 23% of 4107 athletes and a commendable 16% rank in her age group. Her total running time was 00:47:12, 04:20 faster than the average, indicating her strength in running. However, the splits analysis reveals varying performances across different segments, with a notably slower performance in the third running segment and the wall balls segment.
Mcgee's pacing appears to be inconsistent, with a slow start in the first running segment but a rapid pace in the second. Her performance suggests she could improve her strategy for maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. Based on the total running time, Mcgee seems to be a stronger runner than strength athlete, indicating a need for increased focus on strength training.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wismans Nelieke | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:41:01 | |
| Hill Natasha | 2024 Malaga | 01:41:03 | |
| Hayes Jacqui | 2024 Glasgow | 01:41:56 | |
| Carthy Claire | 2023 Dublin | 01:40:58 | |
| Powney Zoe | 2023 Dublin | 01:41:52 | |
| Hadler Anke | 2023 Hannover | 01:41:00 | |
| Stad Brenda | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:41:15 | |
| Künzli Meret | 2019 Hamburg | 01:41:38 | |
| Rosenstein Illona | 2024 Brisbane | 01:41:02 | |
| Yew Kris | 2024 Singapore | 01:41:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:37:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
