Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Köln using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Greve Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Greve Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Greve Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Greve Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:08 | 07:11 to 05:03 | 39.6% |
| Run Total | 01:16 | 38:45 to 37:29 | 23.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 04:56 to 04:06 | 15.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 02:54 to 02:17 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:26 to 04:11 | 4.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 04:19 to 04:04 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:32 to 04:30 | 0.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Greve Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:15 | 00:00 | 04:16 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:15 | 04:19 +00:07 | 04:16 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:41 | 04:33 +00:22 | 08:35 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 12:36 | 02:37 +00:17 | 13:08 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 15:30 | 04:55 +00:16 | 15:45 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 20:41 | 04:22 -00:34 | 20:40 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 24:29 | 04:53 +00:14 | 25:02 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:19 | 29:36 | 04:34 -00:15 | 29:55 -00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 33:55 | 05:01 +00:14 | 34:29 -00:34 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 39:10 | 04:37 -00:05 | 39:30 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 43:42 | 04:56 +00:28 | 44:07 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 49:06 | 01:59 -00:24 | 49:03 +00:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 50:41 | 04:54 +00:27 | 51:02 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 56:02 | 04:29 +00:27 | 55:56 +00:06 |
| Running 8 | 04:19 | 01:00:58 | 05:20 -01:01 | 01:00:25 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:05:17 | 05:41 +01:30 | 01:05:45 -00:28 |
| Roxzone | 04:50 | 01:17:11 | 05:45 -00:55 | 01:17:11 |
However, there are areas of improvement that can enhance his performance. Specifically, his total running time of 00:38:45 was 01:06 slower than the average, indicating a potential need for improvement in his running ability. Additionally, his splits analysis shows that several running segments were slower than average, including Running 2, Running 3, Running 5, and Running 6.
Additionally, Patrick should pay attention to his transitions in the roxzone. By improving his overall fitness level and reducing transition time, he can optimize his performance and gain an advantage over his competitors.
In conclusion, Patrick Greve performed well in the 2023 Köln HYROX race, but there are areas for improvement to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training for running, strength exercises for wall balls and sandbag lunges, and upper body/core strength development for the ski erg, Patrick can work towards achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Evans Nick | 2023 London | 01:16:42 | |
| Pickering Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:49 | |
| Skipp Peter | 2024 Perth | 01:17:03 | |
| Sarkam Brian | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:23 | |
| Walker Ian | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:30 | |
| Mars Sebastiano | 2024 Hamburg | 01:17:16 | |
| Chavez Ruben | 2022 Dallas | 01:17:38 | |
| Randeris Nicki | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:07 | |
| Jongbloed Mike | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:16:59 | |
| Allen Nathan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:19:42 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:25:44 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:27:04 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:36:52 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:12:24 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
