Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 782 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Teague Lawrence's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Teague Lawrence hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Teague Lawrence’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Teague Lawrence's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:10 | 57:47 to 51:37 | 79.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:51 | 09:47 to 08:56 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:40 | 03:27 to 02:47 | 8.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 07:24 to 07:22 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:42 to 06:42 | 0.0% |
| Teague Lawrence | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:58 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 05:58 | 04:47 -00:20 | 05:25 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 08:48 | 10:25 | 05:59 +02:49 | 10:12 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 19:13 | 03:43 -00:03 | 16:11 +03:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:48 | 22:53 | 06:40 +00:08 | 19:54 +02:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 29:41 | 06:32 -01:43 | 26:34 +03:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:54 | 34:30 | 06:41 +00:13 | 33:06 +01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:24 | 41:24 | 07:32 -00:08 | 39:47 +01:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:56 | 48:48 | 07:00 -00:04 | 47:19 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 55:44 | 05:20 -00:19 | 54:19 +01:25 |
| Running 6 | 07:20 | 01:00:45 | 06:43 +00:37 | 59:39 +01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:27 | 01:08:05 | 02:49 +00:38 | 01:06:22 +01:43 |
| Running 7 | 07:39 | 01:11:32 | 06:48 +00:51 | 01:09:11 +02:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:19:11 | 06:57 -00:15 | 01:15:59 +03:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:25:53 | 08:15 -00:47 | 01:22:56 +02:57 |
| Wall Balls | 09:47 | 01:33:21 | 09:06 +00:41 | 01:31:11 +02:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:14 | 01:50:13 | 09:56 -02:42 | 01:50:13 |
Lawrence Teague delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race. His overall time of 01:50:13 placed him in the top 93% of a total of 1203 athletes and in the top 91% of his age group (16-24). However, there were clear elements of his performance that could be improved upon.
Looking at his pacing, Lawrence started slower than average in the initial running segments, which could have contributed to his overall slower running time (00:57:47, 04:00 slower than average). Interestingly, Lawrence's strength segments such as the Ski Erg, Sled Pull, and Rowing were faster than average, suggesting a strength-oriented profile. Notably, Lawrence's roxzone time (00:07:14, 02:44 faster than average) indicates excellent transition and rest management.
For better performance in future races, Lawrence could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shuard Philip | 2023 Birmingham | 01:50:35 | |
| Yannick Roubinet | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:49:53 | |
| Zirm Philipp | 2024 Köln | 01:49:43 | |
| Hammer Marco | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:50:39 | |
| Simon Arpad | 2024 Milan | 01:49:56 | |
| Kleisen Emiel | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:50:15 | |
| Ruble Marc | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:49:53 | |
| Gridley Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:50:12 | |
| Max Rümelin Max Rümelin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:49:45 | |
| Mckenzie Stuart | 2024 Madrid | 01:50:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
