Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 979 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Huntley Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Huntley Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Huntley Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Huntley Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:21 | 05:11 to 03:50 | 29.1% |
| Run Total | 01:17 | 41:33 to 40:16 | 27.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:06 | 04:38 to 03:32 | 23.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 05:10 to 04:37 | 11.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:16 to 02:08 | 2.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:59 to 01:52 | 2.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:04 to 04:59 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:46 to 04:45 | 0.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Huntley Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:42 -01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 03:40 | 04:55 -00:09 | 04:42 -01:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:26 | 05:01 -00:01 | 09:37 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 13:26 | 02:31 -00:15 | 14:38 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 15:42 | 05:17 -00:02 | 17:09 -01:27 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 20:57 | 05:00 -00:41 | 22:26 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 25:16 | 05:18 -00:05 | 27:26 -02:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:10 | 30:29 | 05:09 +00:01 | 32:44 -02:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 35:39 | 05:25 +00:03 | 37:53 -02:14 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 41:07 | 05:08 -00:04 | 43:18 -02:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 46:11 | 05:20 +00:11 | 48:26 -02:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 51:42 | 02:03 -00:04 | 53:46 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 53:41 | 05:17 +00:15 | 55:49 -02:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 59:13 | 04:10 +01:01 | 01:01:06 -01:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:04:24 | 05:34 +00:24 | 01:05:16 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 04:38 | 01:10:22 | 04:11 +00:27 | 01:10:50 -00:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:20:49 | 05:48 +00:09 | 01:20:49 |
Emma Huntley has demonstrated an exceptional performance in the HYROX competition. She finished in the top 3% overall and top 1% in her age group, which is noteworthy. Her total running time of 41:33 is 34 seconds faster than the average, indicating that she has a stronger running profile. She started the race strong, as evidenced by her first running segment being 1:04 faster than the average. However, towards the end of the race, her performance in the running segments slowed down slightly.
Although she performed strongly in the running segments, there were some strength exercises where she lost time, notably the Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls. This suggests that while Emma has a strong runner profile, there is room for improvement in her strength training, particularly in exercises that may be completed towards the end of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Telgen Marthe | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:20:22 | |
| Jackson Meadow | 2022 Leipzig | 01:21:16 | |
| Harris Kim | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:21 | |
| Askim Kine | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:12 | |
| Würgler Cristina | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:20:37 | |
| Nicoud Mirjam | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:21:06 | |
| Ferguson Claire | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:44 | |
| Warrens Cinzia | 2024 Taipei | 01:21:08 | |
| Radka Allen | 2023 Madrid | 01:21:13 | |
| Ormaetxea Ane | 2024 Bilbao | 01:20:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:32:36 | |
| 2022 London | 01:27:19 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:18:42 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:17 | |
| 2022 London | 01:22:46 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:28:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
