Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Asperen Jc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Asperen Jc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Asperen Jc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Asperen Jc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:53 | 46:33 to 42:40 | 69.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:50 | 06:04 to 05:14 | 14.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:28 to 05:01 | 8.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 06:34 to 06:19 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:59 to 04:47 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Van Asperen Jc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:52 | 04:29 -00:05 | 04:41 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 08:16 | 05:03 +00:30 | 09:10 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 13:49 | 02:59 -00:44 | 14:13 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 16:04 | 05:31 +00:24 | 17:12 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 03:50 | 21:59 | 05:05 -01:15 | 22:43 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 25:49 | 05:29 +00:37 | 27:48 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:04 | 31:55 | 05:32 +00:32 | 33:17 -01:22 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 37:59 | 05:41 +00:24 | 38:49 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 44:04 | 04:52 +00:07 | 44:30 -00:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 49:03 | 05:31 +00:44 | 49:22 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 55:18 | 02:14 -00:16 | 54:53 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 57:16 | 05:31 +00:35 | 57:07 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:28 | 01:03:22 | 05:16 +00:12 | 01:02:38 +00:44 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:08:50 | 06:09 +00:35 | 01:07:54 +00:56 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:15:34 | 06:45 -00:11 | 01:14:03 +01:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:52 | 01:27:53 | 07:05 -01:13 | 01:27:53 |
Jc Van Asperen delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 38% overall and top 39% in his age group. His overall time was 01:27:53, with a total running time of 00:46:33, which was 02:34 slower than the average. This suggests a need for improvement in running endurance and efficiency. The initial running segment was strong, indicating a fast start, but subsequent running segments showed a decline, suggesting potential pacing issues. His proficiency in strength-related exercises like the Sled Push and Sled Pull indicates a strength-oriented profile, but there is room for improvement in endurance and hybrid exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grünke Robin | 2023 Wien | 01:28:13 | |
| Brien Andy | 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:10 | |
| Cook Stephen | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:01 | |
| Daleman Remco | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:00 | |
| Mußbach Marvin | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:27:32 | |
| Matteis Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:27:23 | |
| Cheung Eddie | 2023 Manchester | 01:27:27 | |
| Lomba Bruno | 2024 Marseille | 01:28:15 | |
| Maurer Hannes | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:28:06 | |
| VD Kieboom Leo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
