Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 554 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mills Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mills Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mills Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mills Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:58 | 57:01 to 53:03 | 90.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:03 to 04:53 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:33 to 05:23 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 07:10 to 07:04 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:00 to 08:00 | 0.0% |
| Mills Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:11 | 00:00 | 05:35 +01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 07:11 | 04:51 +00:12 | 05:35 +01:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:49 | 12:14 | 06:16 -00:27 | 10:26 +01:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:51 | 18:03 | 03:48 +00:03 | 16:42 +01:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 21:54 | 07:00 -00:43 | 20:30 +01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 28:11 | 06:39 -01:23 | 27:30 +00:41 |
| Running 4 | 07:03 | 33:27 | 06:57 +00:06 | 34:09 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 40:30 | 07:56 -02:09 | 41:06 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 08:31 | 46:17 | 07:21 +01:10 | 49:02 -02:45 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 54:48 | 05:25 +00:08 | 56:23 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 07:18 | 01:00:21 | 07:01 +00:17 | 01:01:48 -01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:07:39 | 02:52 -00:56 | 01:08:49 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:09:35 | 07:03 -00:49 | 01:11:41 -02:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:10 | 01:15:49 | 07:17 -00:07 | 01:18:44 -02:55 |
| Running 8 | 08:43 | 01:22:59 | 08:50 -00:07 | 01:26:01 -03:02 |
| Wall Balls | 08:00 | 01:31:42 | 09:29 -01:29 | 01:34:51 -03:09 |
| Roxzone | 15:29 | 01:55:01 | 10:41 +04:48 | 01:55:01 |
Martin Mills, in the 45-49 age category, placed in the top 65% of 1509 athletes overall and the top 61% of 134 athletes in his age group. His total race time was 01:55:01, and his total running time was 00:57:01, which was 00:53 slower than the average. Martin displayed remarkable strength in exercises like Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, and Farmers Carry, where he performed faster than average times. His best running lap was 00:05:49. However, his performance in the Roxzone, which measures overall fitness and transition times, was slower than average. This indicates that Martin has a strength-focused profile and may need to improve his running and transition times for a better overall rank.
To improve race performance, Martin could implement the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarwar Qasim | 2024 Poznan | 01:54:41 | |
| Clacker Ben | 2024 London | 01:54:41 | |
| Jeiteles Philip | 2019 Hannover | 01:55:00 | |
| Adelakun Isaac | 2024 Milan | 01:54:59 | |
| Voigt Tobias | 2024 Köln | 01:55:14 | |
| Bunce Mark | 2023 Manchester | 01:55:23 | |
| Chavarria Jesus | 2024 Stockholm | 01:54:37 | |
| Magarão Costa Felipe | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:54:59 | |
| Connor Joseph | 2024 Madrid | 01:55:07 | |
| Jones Sion Derfel | 2023 Manchester | 01:54:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
