Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ellis Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ellis Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ellis Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ellis Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:49 | 07:08 to 05:19 | 48.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:13 | 06:18 to 05:05 | 32.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:47 to 06:25 | 9.7% |
| Run Total | 00:14 | 43:15 to 43:01 | 6.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 05:02 to 04:53 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Ellis Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 03:52 | 04:29 -00:07 | 04:45 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 08:14 | 05:06 +00:15 | 09:14 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 13:35 | 03:00 -00:36 | 14:20 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 15:59 | 05:33 +00:08 | 17:20 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 21:40 | 05:08 -00:06 | 22:53 -01:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 26:42 | 05:33 +00:09 | 28:01 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:08 | 32:24 | 05:38 +01:30 | 33:34 -01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 39:32 | 05:44 -00:09 | 39:12 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 45:07 | 04:53 -00:04 | 44:56 +00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 49:56 | 05:35 -00:05 | 49:49 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 55:26 | 02:16 -00:16 | 55:24 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 57:26 | 05:34 -00:02 | 57:40 -00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:18 | 01:02:58 | 05:23 +00:55 | 01:03:14 -00:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:09:16 | 06:15 -00:10 | 01:08:37 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 06:47 | 01:15:21 | 06:49 -00:02 | 01:14:52 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 06:54 | 01:28:56 | 07:15 -00:21 | 01:28:56 |
Steven Ellis, competing in the 50-54 age group at the 2024 Manchester HYROX, delivered an impressive performance, finishing in the top 71% overall and top 50% in his age group. Steven's total running time was notably strong, with a time of 00:43:15, beating the average by 01:04. This indicates a strong runner profile and a solid foundation for endurance. Steven's pacing was also commendable, starting fast in the first running segment and maintaining a consistent speed throughout, albeit a bit slower than average in some segments.
Despite a strong running performance, there are a few segments where Steven can focus on for improvement:
Applying the following strategies could help Steven improve his performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steward Piers | 2024 Taipei | 01:29:09 | |
| Novak Josiah | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:42 | |
| Lejay Valentin | 2023 Paris | 01:28:39 | |
| Kinsella Noel | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:50 | |
| Barker Chris | 2024 London | 01:29:05 | |
| Galibert Florian | 2024 Paris | 01:29:19 | |
| Hensel Marc | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:53 | |
| Fielden Thomas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:10 | |
| Germer Alexander | 2023 Hannover | 01:28:28 | |
| Novo Gilles | 2023 Dubai | 01:29:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
